Scotland's first female judge has been cleared of allegations of bias stemming from her membership of a Jewish law association.
Appeal judges at the Court of Session in Edinburgh yesterday rejected claims Lady Cosgrove's impartiality when ruling on an immigration case of a Palestinian woman was compromised by being part of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists.
It was claimed there were "legitimate grounds" for fearing the judge may have been "unconsciously or unwittingly influenced" in her decision to reject an appeal by Fatima Helow, a failed asylum seeker, in 2004.
Lord Nimmo Smith, who heard the case with Lord Kingarth and Lord Kirkwood, rejected the allegations. While he acknowledged a "fair minded and informed observer" might assume Lady Cosgrove's membership of the IAJLJ might make her sympathetic to the Israeli position, he said it would be "unduly sensitive" to conclude this would lead to a real possibility of bias on her behalf.
Lord Nimmo Smith said the high point of the case made by Ms Helow was that the judge may have been "influenced" by views expressed in association material. He said: "We see no reason to suppose any intelligent and independent-minded judge of the Court of Session - having taken the judicial oath and being well able to form her own views - would be influenced in this way."
The senior judge said the judicial oath was an important protection against actual or apparent bias and it so imbued the judge, it became his or her second nature to abide by it.
"Obviously, the judicial oath, and all that it carries with it, cannot serve as a complete guarantee of impartiality but, in our opinion, the fair-minded and informed observer, taking account of these considerations, would give it great weight," he said.
"Such an observer would also recognise the desirability of a judge's keeping in touch with the world beyond the courts and that his or her personal interests and experience may lead to membership of or involvement with external organisations."
Ms Helow's legal challenge arose after Lady Cosgrove refused her application at the Court of Session for statutory review. Her claim for asylum had been rejected the previous year. Ms Helow, who was studying in Glasgow, gave evidence she had featured in television programmes about massacres at the Sabra-Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon in 1982.
Many Palestinian refugees, including her grandmother, aunt and uncle, were killed after Lebanese Phalangist militia entered the camps. She claimed asylum and human rights protection because of her Palestinian background, sex, Muslim religion and her support of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation.
Mick Napier, chairman of the Scottish Palestine Campaign, who has supported Ms Helow's attempt to remain in the UK, said yesterday's decision "rubbed salt in the wound" of the initial decision to refuse her claim for asylum.
Asked about the allegations of bias regarding Lady Cosgrove, he said: "I'm not privy to the inner thoughts of anyone else. But...the British citizenry...know they are not dealing with a perfect system.
"The reputation of the judicial system has suffered serious knocks and I don't think this decision does anything to revise that. There will be a widespread perception there was a very strong danger of bias and nothing was done to remove that." Lady Cosgrove Hazel Aronson was the first woman to sit on the Sheriff Court Bench, in Glasgow in 1979, and became a temporary High Court and Court of Session judge in October 1992. She was appointed on a permanent basis in 1996 and became Lady Cosgrove. In 2002, she helped rewrite the law of rape by removing force as an essential part of the crime. She is the first woman to be appointed to the Inner House judges in the Court of Session, the civil equivalent of the Court of Criminal Appeal.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article