Presiding Officer Alex Fergusson followed parliamentary protocol to vote for the status quo when his casting vote is required.
Although elected as a Conservative MSP, he does not vote with his party, who supported the bill, and is impartial in the chamber.
Earlier this month, at a previous Budget hearing, Mr Fergusson said if his vote was needed, he would have supported the government's bill which would have allowed time for more debate and negotiation. But on a third stage vote he votes for the status quo, which is last year's Budget.
Mr Fergusson and his two predecessors have all used their casting vote in the past, but none as politically significant as yesterday's vote.
In September 2007 following a parliamentary debate on Glasgow's housing problems, a Labour amendment ended tied at 60 votes on either side.
Mr Fergusson then used his casting vote to defeat the amendment.
In 2003, a shake-up of the fire service was defeated after Presiding Officer George Reid used his casting vote following a Labour back- bench rebellion which left a vote tied at 56 each.
The Scottish Executive had sought to amend the Local Government in Scotland Bill by introducing measures allowing fire chiefs and fire boards to close stations without first seeking ministerial permission.
In 2002 David Steele used his vote to appoint Professor Alice Brown, of Edinburgh University, to the unified post of ombudsman for all public services.
The current presiding officer was returned for the Galloway and Upper Nithsdale seat in the Scottish Parliament in 2007 with an increased majority (3333).
After being elected to the prestigious position of presiding officer soon afterwards, he resigned from the Conservative Party to enable him to perform his duties in an impartial manner, while retaining his commitment to his constituents.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article