LOYALIST paramilitaries have drawn up a chilling ''Doomsday'' plan of
action against a British withdrawal from Northern Ireland, it was
claimed last night.
The plan, said to have been drawn up over several years by the Ulster
Defence Association, the largest loyalist paramilitary group, includes
details of religious trends in many parts of the province.
The Belfast-based Sunday Life newspaper published a series of maps
showing four options on what territory the UDA believes it could hold,
what would be given up and what might be fought for.
In essence the border would be redrawn, with Protestants consolidating
themselves in a smaller Ulster in the North-east of the present
province.
The plan allegedly suggests that two or probably three of Northern
Ireland's six counties would be lost, and considers options such as
taking Catholics living in the east of the province hostage as
''bargaining chips'' for the release of Protestants trapped in the
surrendered west.
Neither the Northern Ireland Office nor the security forces would make
any comment on the blueprint. One document, it was claimed, said the
objective would be to ''establish an ethnic Protestant Homeland'' with
adequate forces deployed along a defensive border and the
''consolidation of territory'' as am immediate objective.
The ''Doomsday'' scenario recognises there would be large numbers of
Catholics left within the Protestant homeland and offers three chilling
options on dealing with them -- expulsion, internment, or nullification.
A prominent member of the Rev. Ian Paisley's Democratic Unionist
Party, Mr Sammy Wilson, last night described the alleged Doomsday plan
as ''a very valuable return to reality''.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article