THE Scottish Labour Party has been rocked by a bitter
behind-the-scenes row over moves by the defeated Labour administration
in Tayside to commit the ultimate political heresy of clinging on to
power with Tory support.
Yesterday Labour's Scottish secretary, Mr Jack McConnell, intervened
to tell leading Labour councillors in the region that ''no Labour
administration worth its salt would get the support of the Tories''.
However, it was not only Labour which was rendered apoplectic by the
political manoeuvring. The SNP last night branded the actions of the
Tayside Labour councillors as ''sordid and squalid''.
A party spokesman said: ''It is party policy for the SNP that we would
never enter into a coalition with the Tories. For Labour councillors on
Tayside to even consider courting the Conservatives to keep their jobs
shows the contempt they have for the voters of Tayside. They should
accept the verdict of the electorate with good grace.''
The SNP emerged after last week's regional elections as the largest
single party in Tayside, winning 22 of the council's 46 seats. Labour's
representation fell from 18 to 16 with the remaining seats divided
between the Conservatives holding four and the Liberal Democrats and
independents with two each.
However, Labour councillors want to cling on to power by nominating
Labour members for convenerships -- a move supported by around
two-thirds of the 16-strong Labour group and one expected to attract
backing from trade unions worried about possible job losses under a new
administration.
Any attempt by Labour to defeat SNP nominations for council
convenerships could only be successful with support from Conservative
councillors.
The councillors will put their case to Tayside Labour Party's general
management committee tonight at what one predicted would be a ''lively
meeting''.
Local Labour Party officials are privately appalled at the manoeuvres
of the group which will meet to consider its final position after the
GMC meeting.
Labour councillor George Hood, the region's former economic
development convener, said of last week's results: ''I don't think it
was a vote against Labour and neither was it a vote for the SNP.
''It is a question of interpreting the will of the people in Tayside.
I don't think the people of Tayside said they were supporting Scottish
Nationalism -- it was a vote against the Tories.''
He added: ''One idea floating around is that we should put forward our
nominees for convenerships at this Friday's meeting of the council. I
think various political groups should vote depending on what they think
is the best option for the region.''
Mr McConnell confirmed that he had spoken to some of the councillors
and added that the Labour Party nationally would make its position known
at tonight's meeting.
''There are no Labour administrations in Scotland kept in power on
Tory votes -- and there will not be,'' he insisted.
''The only party in Scotland which has an administration kept in power
with Tory votes is the SNP in West Lothian. We are not about to make
that mistake.''
One long-serving Labour insider said: ''There is no way that Labour
councillors should be seeking support from the Tories just to save their
own positions.
''I am appalled by the antics of certain leading councillors and so
are many members of the party. They will be told as much in no uncertain
fashion.''
Tayside Tory group leader Bruce Mackie appeared to dismiss any
suggestion of the Tories allying with Labour, but he declined to reveal
how his group would vote.
Councillor Mackie and his three remaining council colleagues will meet
later today to discuss the local post-election situation but last night
he said: ''There is no question at all of us working in any alliance
with any other party.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article