MANY of the events of the period 1912-14 were in the nature of a civil
war, and are comparable to the auctions of a repressive regime towards a
minority. In retrospect, ''Votes for Women'' was no great radical
demand. The woman-hatred which it elicited and the excuses which were
put forward in support of the continuing disenfranchisement of women
turned a simple demand for political reform into a long-term sex war. A
polite pro-suffrage gesture at the installation of Mr Augustine Birrell
as Rector of Glasgow University on December 5, 1912, turned the male
students into rampaging bulls who marched on the WSPU shop in
Sauchiehall Street and wrecked it. It was not simply a question of
breaking the windows, but of destroying the entire shop and its
contents: tables and chairs were broken; stock laid in for Christmas was
destroyed; the few pieces of equipment were smashed; the electrical
wiring was ripped out. Although it was the middle of the day, and the
young gentlemen of Glasgow were dancing up the street with broken
furniture, there were no arrests and no witnesses. From that point
onwards, the suffragettes recruited male enforcers - burley dockers and
miners - to protect their meetings from the attention of Glasgow's
university educated young men.
SUFFRAGE militacy escalated and took different forms. A natural
history case in the Royal Scottish Museum was smashed in February 1913,
and the King's portrait in the National Gallery in Edinburgh was
damaged. In April 1913 the Western Meeting Club in Ayr was burned to the
ground, causing damage worth #3500. An attempt was made to set fire to
Kelso racecourse stand. In May 1913 the mansion house of Farrington Hall
in Dundee was bombed and burnt, #10,000 worth of damage being caused.
Large unoccupied houses were a favourite target for the militants; it
was hoped that the insurance companies would have to bring pressure to
bear on the Government to grant the vote, for their own financial
protection. The suffragettes always took the greatest care to target
property, not lives.
The militants who had been caught in the act of attempting arson at
Kelso were sentenced at Jedburgh Sheriff Court. The ringleader, an
Edinburgh teacher called Arabella Scott, described it as ''a mere
attempt to burn a low gambling shed''. She and two others received nine
months' imprisonment. A further two accomplices, the Misses Thomson --
elderly Edinburgh ladies who had formerly been missionaries in India --
received lighter sentences.
On account of this ''Jeddart Justice'', the Royal Observatory in
Edinburgh was bombed and #100 worth of damage was caused. This was
followed by an unsuccessful attempt to set fire to the waiting-rooms on
both platforms of Shields Road Station, Glasgow. The Gatty Marine
Laboratory of St Andrews University was severely damaged by fire in June
1913.
Militancy was unabated. In August 1913 two women hid on the golf
course at Lossiemouth and physically assaulted the Prime Minister. There
were fires at Fettes College and Morelands House, Edinburgh. In December
1913 there was a spectacular fire at Kelly House, Wemyss Bay, and the
#30,000 mansion designed by William Leiper and Daniel Cottier, and built
for ship-owner Alexander Stephen, was left in ruins.
No-one was ever arrested for it, but women were heard laughing
immediately before the fire broke out, and afterwards copies of suffrage
magazines were found on the driveway. Sixty-five years later, Scottish
journalist Julie Davidson admitted in a newspaper article that she knew
the woman who did it. Perhaps this was the first safe opportunity to
admit such knowledge.
The women who were arrested for such offences received savage
sentences. The apprehension of Dr Elizabeth Dorothea Chalmers Smith,
medical doctor, mother of six and wife of the Reverend Chalmers Smith of
Glasgow's Calton Parish Church, whilst trying to burn down an empty
house at 6 Park Gardens in the West End, caused a sensation. She and
artist Ethel Moorhead were caught red-handed.
Shortly before the trial, there had been a raid on a house of ill-fame
in Pitt Street, and because quite a number of prominent Glasgow citizens
were involved, the case was hushed up, and a trivial sentence of two
weeks passed on the owners of the house. By contrast, Dr Chalmers Smith
and Miss Moorhead were sentenced to eight months.
The case was tried in the High Court at Jail Square and some hundreds
of Suffrage women attended the trial . . . When the sentence was
pronounced, the women rose from all parts of the court and protested,
crying out ''Pitt Street, Pitt Street'' while others started to pelt the
Judge and counsel with small apples. A cartoon appeared in one of the
evening papers with the caption ''Hallow'een at the High Court'' showing
the Judge and the barristers dodging the apples, the Judge getting one
in the eye and another official with a fork in his mouth catching one.
The contrast in sentences where human life and property were at stake
was so great, that the women were filled with wrath and indignation at
this outrageous travesty of justice.
Both women immediately went on hunger strike. When they became weak in
body, they were released from prison under the Cat and Mouse Act,
introduced in April 1913, which allowed for the re-arrest of prisoners
once their health recovered. A pair of detectives were posted on the
door of the manse in Dennistoun which was the home of the Smith family,
to make sure that the dangerous Dr Smith did not escape. She did on
occasion, dressed up in her younger sister's school uniform.
In the long term, his wife's feminism was too much for the Rev.
William Chalmers Smith. They divorced at a time when it was difficult
for a Church of Scotland minister to do so. The boys went with their
father and the girls with their mother. After the Great War, Dr
Elizabeth Smith worked in the newly established child welfare clinics in
Glasgow, doing pioneering work in child-care, and raising her daughters
to be doctors. She died in 1944, and her silver WSPU Hunger Strike medal
was donated to the People's Palace by one of her daughters.
When Ethel Moorhead, her accomplice in the Park Gardens raid, was
re-arrested, she was less fortunate. In Edinburgh's Calton Jail she was
clumsily force-fed and contracted pneumonia, the food having been poured
into her lungs. Her left ear was also burned with hot wires, apparently
either to lessen her resistance or deter her from struggle.
The medical officer who did this to Ethel Moorhead came from Perth
Prison, one of the worst prisons as far as women torture was concerned.
Hunger strikers committed elsewhere in Scotland in 1914 were sent to
Perth for forcible feeding because, according to the Secretary of State
for Scotland, ''We have there medical officers who are accustomed to
perform the operation in the criminal lunatic department there''.
In July 1914 Frances Parker, a niece of Lord Kitchener, was caught
trying to blow up Robert Burns's cottage in Alloway. She went on hunger
strike, was transferred from Ayr Prison, and received the worst Perth
Prison had to offer. She was fed by violence, and afterwards held down
for two hours. On the third day of force-feeding she lost consciousness,
and instead of being subjected to the nasal tube again, three wardresses
attempted to feed her by the rectum. This is her account.
Thursday July 16 . . . the three wardresses appeared again. One of
them said that if I did not resist she would send the others away and do
what she had come to do as gently and as decently as poss-
ible. I consented. This was another attempt to feed me by the rectum,
and was done in a cruel way, causing great pain.
She returned some time later and said she had ''something else'' to
do. I took it to be another attempt to feed me in the same way, but it
proved to be a grosser and more indecent outrage, which could have no
other purpose than to torture. It was followed by a soreness which
lasted for several days . . .
FRANCES Gordon, arrested for attempted arson in Lanarkshire, was
sentenced in the High Court in Glasgow in June 1914 and received the
same treatment at Perth. She was both fed with the nasal tube and had
injections into her bowel three times a day. Her health was wrecked. On
her release her doctor described her as having the appearance of a
famine victim.
The treatment of women in Perth Prison was a national scandal.
Suffrage organisers were deeply concerned for their health. With an
impending royal visit, Janie Allan of the Glasgow WSPU tried to bargain
with the Lord Provost of Glasgow, promising no militancy during the
visit if the force-feeding could be stopped.
It should not be doubted that she was in a position to do this. The
Allans, of the Allan Shipping Line, were one of the families who ran
Glasgow. Much of Janie's own money had gone to supporting women's
causes, including the Women's Shelter in Gibson Street in the East End,
set up during the great depression in the winter of 1908-9. Her brother
James, known as ''the millionaire socialist'', tried repeatedly to win
Dennistoun for the ILP in the years leading up to the Great War.
The entire membership of the Scottish WSPU was deeply shocked when
Janie, their chief organiser and financier, was summarily sacked by the
Pankhursts for bargaining with the enemy. Helen Crawfurd and Dr Mabel
Jones were sent to sort out the matter with the Pankhursts. Helen
Crawfurd later wrote:
While Chrystabel presented her case as the legal woman, it was to Mrs
Pankhurst that the credit must be given for convincing us that the
action taken was right. Mrs Pankhurst presented her case like this. You
are all attached to Miss Allan because she is such a fine person, so are
we. Not only that, but Miss Allan is a generous contributor to our
funds. Do you think that this action has been taken without serious
thought? The position is this, that the only thing that can stop
militancy is the granting of the Vote to Women. We cannot bargain with
the enemy. If Scottish women are prepared to bargain on any other terms,
then English women are not.
We felt humiliated that we could have made such an error. We returned
fully convinced that both Miss Allan and ourselves had allowed our
hearts to run away with our heads. The majority of the Glasgow members
accepted the decision, as did Miss Allan. Chrystabel's legal reasoning
did not convince; it was Mrs Pankhurst's plain commonsense presentation.
She could be very firm, but she was also an approachable human being,
with charm and sound reasoning powers.
Janie Allan did not manage to strike her bargain and the royal visit
of July 1914 had many little surprises for the royal party. At Dalmuir
the window of a cottage opposite the royal stand was thrown open and a
banner with ''Votes for Women'' and ''No Forcible Feeding'' was flown,
while a woman with a megaphone made a speech. Three days later (July 10)
in Perth, 27-year-old Rhoda Fleming jumped on to the bonnet of the
King's car and tried to smash the window. Typed petitions against the
forcible feeding were found. In another street, a placard was hung from
a window with the inscription ''Visit Your Majesty's Torture Chamber in
Perth Prison''.
Although Janie Allan was cut off from the suffrage cause without a
chance to exonerate herslf, she had been totally loyal to Mrs Pankhurst.
It was she who had organised Mrs Pankhurst's visit to Glasgow in March
1914, when she addressed a mass meeting in the St Andrews Halls. Mrs
Pankhurst's presence was only half-expected, as she was subject to
re-arrest under the Cat and Mouse Act.
The Glasgow WSPU were well prepared: the flower-screened platform hid
several strands of barbed wire, and the platform party was armed with
Indian clubs. Mrs Pankhurst was smuggled into the hall in a laundry
basket, and to the surprise and delight of the audience, she was able to
appear. She had no sooner started her speech, however, when the police
rushed the platform in great numbers. Rioting ensued, the police making
free use of their batons ''in a hysterical and brutal fashion''. The
platform party retaliated with flowerpots and clubs.
Mrs Pankhurst was re-arrested, and police behaviour was such that
Janie Allan and the Glasgow WSPU spent the following months attempting
to take legal action against them. They were unsuccessful in their
attempts -- the police had seized more than enough evidence to justify
their actions. The Daily Record published a photograph of all the
weapons confiscated from the suffragettes, including the barbed wire,
Indian clubs, and even a gun. Over 60 years later, the Strathclyde
Police still had one of the Indian clubs in their black museum, among
the gory murder weapons of Glasgow's criminal history.
Until the outbreak of the Great War in August 1914, the suffragettes
were in the news every other day, and were putting their lives in danger
so that women could have a political future. Many historians have
ignored this, while others have had the insolence to say that the
militancy alienated the Government and inhibited the women's cause. We
might still be waiting for the right to vote yet if it had been left to
the men.
Extracted from The Hidden History of Glasgow's Women: The Thenew
Factor by Elspeth King, to be published next week by Mainstream, price
#14.99.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article