A WOMAN jailed for life for the murder of a prostitute who fell to her death from the 20th floor of a tower block had her conviction quashed by an appeal court yesterday.
Rose Broadley, 38, was originally found guilty of the murder of Joanna Colbeck after a trial at the High Court in Glasgow in March 2004.
She was accused of causing Ms Colbeck to fall from the window of a tower block in the Gorbals, Glasgow, in May 2002.
Ms Broadley's defence argued that Ms Colbeck, who was 28, had committed suicide and that Ms Broadley was in bed at the time.
However, the court heard had that Ms Broadley had previously carried out a series of assaults on the victim.
A jury convicted Ms Broadley, of Langside, Glasgow, and she was later sentenced to life, with a minimum of 15 years.
However, through her legal team, she lodged an appeal against both the conviction and sentence. In the appeal she claimed there was no "evidential basis" upon which a reasonable jury properly directed could have convicted her of murder.
She also argued there was no evidence that Ms Colbeck had indeed been murdered.
The judgment of the Appeal Court, delivered by Lord Johnston, stated that murder had not been proven.
The ruling said: "We are therefore satisfied that there was not sufficient evidence to put to the jury to entitle them to convict the appellant of murder.
"Recognising as we do that interpretation of statements or remarks by an accused person is a matter primarily for the jury, there are simply not enough surrounding circumstances in the present case against that background to form the base for sufficient evidence in law for the jury to consider even whether a murder was committed.
"The appeal is allowed and the conviction for murder will be quashed."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article