EVEN at the best of times, interpreting political events in the Middle East can be like standing in a room full of revolving mirrors. No sooner do you think you have an issue or event in perspective, than it twists or shifts like a kaleidoscope.
Such has been the case with Syria and Lebanon over the last few weeks. Are Syrian troops staying or going from Lebanon?
Yesterday, the Syrians did indeed appear to be leaving. But, despite this, US political pressure on Damascus is likely to continue.
Inside Syria itself, reaction to this political strain is now the latest subject of speculation. Will Syrian President Bashar al-Assad survive, or is there a force for change growing within the country? Hugh Macleod goes on to the streets of Damascus in search of answers.
Political pressure is also the order of the day in France. On the very day the International Olympic Committee was giving Paris the once-over as a possible host for the games, thousands took to the streets to voice a myriad of grievances. Those advocating a "no" vote in the upcoming referendum on the EU constitution no doubt caught the worried eye of President Jacques Chirac. But, as Hugh Schofield reports, the political disquiet runs much deeper than that.
Far from the boulevards, explorer Tom Avery has been preparing to follow in the footsteps of his famous polar predecessor Robert Peary. Between huskie feeding times, Paul Gains talked to Avery about his daunting mission.
And far from the frozen wastes, "it's good to talk" seems to be the message coming out of Africa. If given the chance, writes Fred Bridgland, there seems little doubt that a massive economic boost could come from the mobile phone revolution that is sweeping the continent. In a week that saw Tony Blair's Commission for Africa make its recommendations, perhaps there is a lesson here: that it's also good to listen when Africans themselves tell us what they need.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article