After more than 10 years of awards and sold-out houses, Les Miserables remains a show which is rather misunderstood.
The production photography of actors in rags, shuffling their way across dark, gloomy sets, and earnest young men holding flags aloft has led people to believe that the show isn't exactly a barrel of laughs.
Which it isn't. But that doesn't mean it can't be uplifting. In fact Les Miserables is the greatest emotional work-out in modern musical theatre.
There are few more improbable texts than Victor Hugo's nineteenth-century novel to make a successful transition to the consistently popular area of musical theatre. But Alain Boublil and Claude-Michel Schonberg's adaption concentrates on strong characters such as Jean Valjean, the man who spends his life on the run from the lawman Javert and fulfils his promise to a dying woman that he will take care of the daughter she was forced into prostitution to support. The message that runs through is one of honour and courage, to fight for the love of one's country and those we hold most dear.
With thoughtfully designed but sparse sets and costumes, Les Miserables rises or falls on the strength of its singing - and in this three-month run with Jeff Leyton as Jean Valjean, Peter Corry as Javert, Carmen Cusack as Fantine, and Alex Sharpe as Eponine; the songs which have become modern classics are delivered with the required fragility or strength; in most cases, a delicate balance of both.
There is nothing highbrow about Les Miserables. It touches on the best and worst of the human
condition and ultimately succeeds through outstanding performances. The night I was there Jimmy Logan was the first in the circle to give the cast a deserved standing ovation - how much more of a recommendation do
you need?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article