WHERE Waiting for Godot is a play that can't begin, Endgame is a play that can't finish. The two amount to pretty much the same thing, a wry comment on the futility of existence performed as a wry comment on the futility of theatre. The irony is that the
deeper these plays sink into life's meaningless void, the more life-affirming they become.
Endgame is the more troubling, though. Here, on Kenny Miller's set, the stage lights hang with cobwebs, the walls are bare chipboard, and the costumes, stained and muddied, hint at better times long past. What's unnerving is less the relationships - the cruel interdependence of child and parent, master and servant - than the idea that outside there is nothing. One streaky window looks out on a motionless sea, the other on a
featureless landscape. This is a more fearful desolation even than the miserable life inside.
After all, where there is life there is at least the possibility of progression. And where there is Beckett, there is always humour, dry though it is. The play takes its title from the closing moves in chess, and there's something of the grandmaster tournament in the way the mobile Clov (a lolloping Brendan Hooper, face caked in grey mud) and the chair-bound Hamm (a resonant Simon Dutton in pyjama top and dress suit) spar their way through their snappy repartee. They are intelligent performances, at once witty and forlorn, with just an echo of the music hall.
Emerging from the bins in Robert David MacDonald's Circle Studio production, Owen Gorman signals his elderliness rather too much as Nagg, but Ida Schuster's Nell is in the great existentialist tradition of Beckett's women.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article