SCOTTISH historians yesterday hit out at claims by a leading American expert that King James VI of Scotland was openly homosexual.
In a new book on the life of King James VI and I, Professor Michael Young, of Illinois Wesleyan University, says the king was unabashedly gay.
He said the Stuart king, whose version of the Bible is frequently quoted for its denunciation of homosexuality, lusted after the young men of his court.
He believes James's sexuality endangered both the monarchy and the English political system.
But Professor Young's views are in direct contrast to those of Scottish historians.
They feel James, who became the first king of both Scotland and England after the Union of the Crowns in 1603, was wrongly identified as being gay because he used the flowery language which was fashionable at the time.
Mr Archie McKerracher, an expert on Scottish history from Stirling, said it was unlikely James's sexuality had political repercussions.
He said: ''It has been hinted at before that King James VI was homosexual but it is unlikely he was actually a practising homosexual.
''Had he been open about his sexual orientation then it would have been more widely reported.
''It is true he had close relationships with some of the younger men of the court but it is impossible to tell if that went into the bedroom.
''I think he may have preferred the company of these young men more because he himself was very unattractive.
''He had a very difficult up-bringing after his mother's death and probably felt a little uncomfortable around women - but it does not mean he was homosexual.''
Dr Grant Simpson, an honorary reader of history at Aberdeen University, said: ''Who knows what happened behind the bedroom door? He did have seven children, the last at the age of 50 years old.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article