Presenter's top goes to bottom of class as TV proves a damp squib
WHAT would the Rev I M Jolly have made of it all?
Those sorry souls who opted against an arctic street party celebration in favour of a homely Hogmanay with a wee dram, a round of shortcake and a snug seat in front of the box, were left channel-hopping in despair.
The BBC's Hogmanay Live show was criticised primarily because of Jackie Bird's alarmingly revealing plunging
neckline.
Scottish Television was condemned for being fake and pre-recorded.
Police and met office forecasters embarked upon a futile exercise on Sunday when they urged revellers to be sensible and celebrate the New Year indoors.
The sensible ones had already checked the TV schedules, and knew that a fireworks extravaganza plus Bjorn Again, Teenage Fanclub or Moby, even watched in sub-zero temperatures through a driving snow storm, was, by far, the most appealing way to bring in a brand new year.
The alternatives were: that top, interspersed with performances from the Proclaimers, Eddi Reader and Ricky Ross, all excellent artists who had their heyday around a decade ago; or the bubbly duo Alison Craig and Stephen Jardine, who did their very best to pretend that it was 10, nine, eight seconds to midnight, when every viewer was only too well aware that it was, in fact, about 8.30pm on an early December night some three weeks ago.
John Davidson, The Herald's fashion director, speculated that Ms Bird was following in the perilously high-heeled footsteps of such tele-babes as Carol Vorderman.
But Ms Bird was having none of it. ''My gingham, laced-top pinafore was at the cleaners and it was all I had in the wardrobe,'' she said.
''Anyway, I work damn hard to get into something like that and Hogmanay is the only time to wear it. Your fashion director should join the 21st century.''
BBC and ITV were ignoring the critics yesterday and defending their Hogmanay schedules. The BBC claimed to have won the ''battle of the bells'' - the viewing figures for the critical half hour between 11.45pm and 12.15am.
A BBC spokesman claimed that early figures showed that 1.2m people, which represents a 64% share of the audience, tuned into Hogmanay Live, the show presented by Ms Bird with Dougie Vipond.
He said 268,000, 15% of the audience, watched Scottish's The Hogmanay Show.
Ken MacQuarrie, the head of programmes at BBC, said: ''The Hogmanay package was a very strong mix of comedy, music and entertainment, aimed at every age group and the response of viewers - who appear to have tuned in in their hundreds of thousands - is extremely
pleasing.''
Sandy Ross, the managing director of Scottish Television, said: ''We were very pleased with our show. It was a good, lively, traditional Hogmanay show.''
But on the quiet streets of Glasgow yesterday, those who had spent the bells stuck in front of the box were slightly less enthusiastic.
Tony Mallon, a 32-year-old chef from Glasgow, was initially glued to the BBC.
''Only an Excuse was great and Chewin The Fat was even better,'' he said. ''But then what happened? It was not very Scottish. I switched over to watch Donnie Munro and the Alexander
Brothers.''
David McManus, a 45-year-old office worker, said Scottish Television's Hogmanay Show was ''fake'' and ''obviously pre-recorded''.
''I preferred the bands on the show but switched over and caught Jackie Bird singing. She may not have looked great but she sounded fantastic. She has a latent talent there.''
Adam Ford, a 21-year-old marketing student, making his early-morning way home from a party, said: ''Anyone sad enough to stay in on Hogmanay deserves to be subjected to crap TV.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article