JAMES McLaren, the Stirling County centre suspended for 20 weeks for kicking Melrose fly-half Craig Chalmers on the head, has had his sentence increased by six weeks after a Murrayfield disciplinary appeal hearing.
In an unprecedented move last night, the Scottish Rugby Union announced that McLaren's appeal against the original sentence had been dismissed - and that he would now be banned until May 31.
The union also announced that, in future, the punishment for kicking an opponent on the head would be a mandatory minimum ban of 26 weeks.
SRU discipline secretary Iain Goodall declared: ``We want to emphasise that foul play has no place in rugby union. The Appeals Committee has determined that any player who kicks another in the head will receive a minimum suspension of 26 weeks for a first offence, expect in exceptional circumstances.''
McLaren, 22, who returned to his native Stirling this season from Australia, where he had been playing rugby league with Canberra Raiders, had hoped to further his rugby career in Scotland.
He was cited by Melrose after the incident during the Premiership tussle at Bridgehaugh on November 16, when Chalmers was left groggy after a ruck. At the first disciplinary hearing McLaren was found guilty and banned until mid-April.
The initial appeal was heard before Christmas. A decision was adjourned until Monday, when the tribunal reconvened, and Chalmers was called to give evidence.
Stirling County had claimed that slow-motion video evidence proved that while Chalmers had, indeed, been kicked, the act had not been deliberate.
McLaren lives in a remote cottage, without telephone, near Stirling and last night County team manager Ralph McNaught said he did not even know if the player had been informed of the increased sentence.
``James will be devastated. I'm angry, too, that the SRU seem to have released this to the media before letting the club know. James was keen to advance his rugby career in Scotland. This sentence has put a halt on that for the time being,'' said McNaught.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article