Julia Langdon meets former Lonrho chief Sir Edward Du Cann, who is
raising storm signals to show that he is still a force to be reckoned
with
ONCE he was chairman of everything. In his new book the index list of
his chairmanships alone runs for more than three inches. There are even
more in the reference books. He ran the Tory Party. He ran Lonrho. He
occupied a powerful position of influence in the establishment, and he
ran rings around everybody else. Was that only four years ago? An
inquiry to Lonrho for his current telephone number is met by the
response: ''Sorry. How do you spell Du Cann?''
When we do meet, it is at a wine bar near Victoria Station, chosen by
Sir Edward. It is a modest establishment, serving excellent claret with
a light salad lunch at an affordable price -- which is to say, by his
previous standards, cheap. Sir Edward Du Cann is on his uppers.
He is broke, bankrupt and, perhaps worst of all, bereaved. His wife,
Jenifer, died earlier this year. He is facing trial next January in an
action brought against him by the Department of Trade and Industry for
being unfit to be a company director. The proceedings are continuing
despite the independent findings of two medical examinations that he
has, at some point in the recent past, suffered a heart attack, his
health is deteriorating, and he is unfit to stand trial.
Never, he says, wearily recounting what he calls his Job's journey of
the past several years, has he been more miserable in life.
Yet he looks better than ever he did at the peak of his twin careers
in business and politics, and at the time of his great influence when he
was a figure of authority in the corridors of Westminster, when what he
said, went. He is 71 and sprightly, weather-beaten from walking the dog
-- alone now -- in the winds of Alderney. That is where he would rather
be than anywhere, certainly rather than on a yacht in the south of
France, where Tiny Rowland would assuredly make him most welcome if he
wanted to go, which he doesn't.
It might have amused Jeni to go for a few days, but now . . . why
bother? Alderney is the island where he and Jeni -- the love of his
life, as he repeatedly says -- spent their four short years of marriage,
happy despite her ongoing battle against cancer, his against
circumstances.
A fortnight in the sun is, anyway, no answer to anything and he does
not seek help from Rowland, or anyone. The navy blue Rolls-Royce went
back when he resigned the chairmanship of Lonrho, Tiny Rowland's
company. That was when he had learned of the Government's plan to act
against him in 1991 for his role as a non-executive director of
something called the Homes Assured Corporation. It was set up in 1988 to
help council tenants buy their homes and collapsed a year later, #10m
adrift. That was when everything went for him, too.
Although two fellow directors have been found guilty of trading while
insolvent, the chairman of the company has not been proceeded against,
nor has the full-time finance director, nor the man who controlled the
company.
''If I am guilty of something than so is every other -- no, most of
the directors of private companies in the United Kingdom, including all
the clubs in the Football League.''
He protests, brightly, that he was brought up never to complain. ''I
hope you don't think the book is a whinge,'' he says at one point. ''I'm
not belly-aching,'' he says later. But that is not what he means, not at
all. He means, in fact, to complain a great deal about the way in which
he is currently being treated. That is why he has written this book.
That is why we are here, eating ham and salad over, of all things ''The
Chairman's Claret''.
''Do you miss . . .'' I start to ask, ''. . . Yes, I do, dreadfully,''
he interrupts before the question is finished. I was going to ask about
Westminster, but it doesn't really matter, because, in truth, he misses
everything.
He thinks he has been singled out as the victim in this affair and the
signs are that he has decided to make a fuss. It looks very much as if,
to use the naval parlance that he would enjoy from his own experience in
the RNVR in the Second World War and as a one-time Admiral of the House
of Commons Yacht Club, he is raising storm signals for the Government's
benefit.
They realise that he knows where a great many bodies are buried. He is
giving notice that he does not plan to be interred himself without
making life uncomfortable indeed for a lot of those who are still
around. ''I wouldn't ask for favours. I would just ask not to be
discriminated against -- which I have been,'' he says.
And the mystery is, the question that needs to be answered, the point
that makes all this interesting: why? Given all that power and position,
given what we know about the way the establishment works, why is it
throwing the book at Sir Edward Du Cann, of all people, he who was
promised a peerage and has been rewarded instead with penury?
He who ran the 1922 Committee; who ran the Public Accounts Committee;
who ran the committee which picked the membership of other committees;
who ran the committee of the chairmen of all the committees; he who was
the big I-Am; who fixed the leadership for Margaret in 1975; who told
her later that she should go gracefully, at a time rather before she
wanted to hear the news?
He has little doubt about this, or purports to have little. He
believes that because of the row about the acquisition of Harrods and
the House of Fraser by Mohammed Al Fayed -- so strongly contested by
Lonrho -- two senior civil servants in the Department of Trade decided
that it would be ''a good idea to discredit me''.
Sir Edward, as chairman of Lonrho, was obviously a principal player in
the ever-increasingly complicated game that surrounded the ownership of
the House of Fraser. He told me, in all seriousness, that it would be a
great relief to everybody in the establishment if he fell over in the
street in Victoria as we left after our claret. He believes that he is
an embarrassment. And this is a man, let us not forget, who knows about
more conspiracies and knows more about conspiracy theories than most of
us could imagine, let alone conjure up in a dream.
He believes that there was a view that if he, Sir Edward
in-all-his-pomp, was not proceeded against there would be a view that
the Government was prepared to let off a prominent Tory, one of their
own, and that once the proceedings had been started, they dare not halt
them. And he feels very sore about it all.
He also thinks -- and this is very important -- that nobody knows how
the Tory Party (or for that matter Lonrho) ought to be run these days.
Everyone shouts their mouth off among today's vulgarians and yet no-one
knows what they are shouting about. Sir Edward Du Cann's message, and it
is only just a murmur at the moment, is that he has got a great deal to
tell and there is a distinct possibility he may soon raise his voice.
They are being warned.
* Two Lives. The Political and Business Careers of Edward Du Cann.
Images: #17.95.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article