ON July 30 Alistair Moffat of Scottish Television gave the Sabhal Mor
Ostaig lecture on Gaelic television and the preservation of Gaelic as a
living language. His message was a very gloomy one indeed. He said that
the view of Welsh academic experts was that Gaelic was finished and we
should give up.
I write about this with a great sense of urgency because in a recent
letter to you I took issue with Dr James Shaw Grant who argued in a long
piece that Highlanders should forget their terrible history and
concentrate on their computers in a campus-free University of the
Highlands and Islands.
Gaelic-free too, if Mr Moffat's analysis is right. But then, sitting
in front of their lonely VDUs, students wouldn't need to communicate at
all, except no doubt via the Internet.
I said in my letter that a University of the Highlands and Islands
should restore Highland history in full. Even more important would be to
restore the Gaelic language and culture, we have so much to learn.
Gaelic was once the language of all Scots for many centuries. The
language enshrines our deepest community instincts. It is not just the
language of the Gaeltachd. The vast majority of Scots and
English-speaking Scots are simply people whose ancestors at some stage
lost their original language under the pressure of English.
Scots contain hundreds of Gaelic words. The ''wee county'' in which I
live has a Gaelic name and nearly all the place-names in it are Gaelic.
Mr Moffat's aim of 100,000 Gaelic speakers by the end of the century
is a good one, but it will require a very well-organised campaign,
linking television with Gaelic language classes all over the country so
that everyone knows where they can get tuition.
Total residential immersion classes for people like me, a retired
university linguist, could quickly increase the number of teachers.
Finally, we have a great deal to learn from countries like Israel and
Finland where the national languages were brought back from near
extinction. The various organisations involved should study that
experience.
Andrew Lockhart Walker,
7 Lovers' Loan,
Dollar.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article