Bitter pills: Irene Adams vows to fight on against drug pushers
despite warnings to 'quit meddling'.
WHEN Irene Adams talks about her impulsive stand against narcotics
overlords and their sodality of bullies it is as if the pages of a novel
are being turned. Just for a moment you may imagine you are sitting not
in Paisley but close to the tortured heart of Sicily, listening to a
courageous widow nail her anger on the Mafia.
In Italy, of course, Adams would be elevated to living sainthood by
now, a distinction that would place her in even greater danger from
those long-practised in unseen vengeance with precision.
She tilts her head in laughter at the comparison but there are enough
references there for her to say that what is urgently needed in this
country is a sophisticated Witness Protection scheme. By this she means
that significant police informers should feel confident that they can be
spirited away from the very real threat of vendettas to live in secure
houses where their new identities will never be breached.
This would depend on flexible, confidential liaison between police
forces and housing authorities throughout the country, but in purging
its drugs menace America is now proving such a service is possible. And
here Northern Ireland's troubles also provided the Army and the RUC with
effective experience in facilitating secret escape to elsewhere for
those brave enough to spy on the netherworld of terrorism.
But has intimidation from drug peddlers reached such a fearsome pitch
in Britain that informants require this kind of cast-iron vanishing
service? Adams, whose Paisley North constituency contains the original
temazepam township of Ferguslie Park, has no doubt that fear of reprisal
can carry as damaging consequences for society as the raw needlework of
drug-abuse itself.
She believes Clare Short's recent off-the-cuff misfortune in mooting
debate on the legalisation of certain drugs was blown up out of all
proportion. Adams herself would support the need for frank and serious
discussion if only to alert the rest of us to the enormity of the
problem. From her vantage point the outlook is terrifying, but most
people, she says, simply close their eyes to the horror which is both
funding and destroying so many corners of our culture.
''People saw this campaign was in earnest when we set out to get
temazepam capsules banned. Now we have achieved this, and quite a lot of
folk are coming forward with information, but out there there are still
great numbers of desperately scared individuals who feel at too great a
risk to help.''
Better than most Irene Adams understands the perils because they are
also stacked against her door. Anonymity's curse arrives by telephone,
or by the crudest letter, but threats have also reached her children and
in-laws, the over-aggressive shove in crowded places being followed by
muffled warnings that Adams should quit her ''meddling for everybody's
sake''.
Her anti-drugs crusade grew from no planned strategy but was a
spontaneous response to the engulfing worries of her constituents.
''This is maybe foolhardy but I never worried about the consequences for
me, although the threats do scare me for my family. However, it would
have been very wrong not to have acted on other people's behalf.''
Her house and movements are now carefully monitored by the police and
she and her three children keep in constant touch through contact
telephone numbers. But long before this the Adams' household learned to
be secure beyond the norm when Allen, her late husband and politician
was one of the Labour Whips for Northern Ireland.
''Every day we had to be vigilant about anything suspicious. That also
meant I had to drive the kids to school each time by a varied route. So,
in a way, none of this now is unexpected or unfamiliar, and I must say
the police are excellently supportive.''
Appalled at the rising number of amputations and deaths caused by
injecting jellies (the now prohibited temazepam capsules), Adams
launched her campaign early this year. A spate of shootings, death
threats and gang wrangles intensified her commitment last spring.
There were also her allegations that FCB Enterprise Security Ltd, a
community business funded by Renfrew District Council, Strathclyde
Regional Council and the Scottish Office, and run by Labour Party
members, was being used as a front for money-laundering. Vocal attack
and counter-attack have marked the rhythm of events since then.
Meanwhile, Strathclyde Police, the Scottish Office and Renfrew District
Council each have the matter under investigation.
At the same time, but for separate reasons, local Labour Party
activity has been effectively suspended in the constituencies of Renfrew
West and Inverclyde, Paisley North and Paisley South following
accusations of manipulation. The findings of the national party's own
internal inquiry are expected in a matter of weeks.
Did all this fire and spittle, the seething denunciations, prime Adams
for the minor stroke which befell her during the first night of her New
York holiday last August? Now fully recovered, she reflects that stress
was undoubtedly a factor, but the whole experience was made more
traumatic because it occurred precisely five years to the day that her
husband collapsed with a brain haemorrhage during a family holiday in
Spain. Allen Adams died three weeks later.
But that night last summer, in her bedroom at the Helmsley Hotel on
East 58th, she first thought she was suffering from the New York
heatwave, like everybody else. The temperature was over 100 degrees, she
was in jet-lag and, with her daughter, she had been shopping and
strolling by Central Park.
At 4am the symptoms of what doctors called a transitory ischaemic
attack began with the loss of power in her left hand. ''My daughter
Barbara was staying in the same room, and I woke her up and said: 'I
don't want to alarm you but I think I might be having a small stroke'.
Well, naturally she leapt out of bed. But for some reason I was
perfectly calm. I remember saying: 'If it is a stroke then it's a real
pain in the neck because it probably means the end of the holiday'.''
Later in the Roosevelt Hospital her condition worsened, then
stabilised. But her recurring thought was how the children would cope
''if this thing turns out to be as bad as it might''. Had she left them
well prepared? ''That past family tragedy had taught me that every one
of us is more vulnerable than we believe, but I just felt the family
were too young -- Barbara, 23, Kirsty, 21, and Allen, just 17 -- to go
through all that pain so soon again.''
Speedy, comprehensive insurance took care of the bills which totalled
around $10,000, but Adams has nothing but praise for the New York
treatment, the expertise immediately on hand, the hotel's efficiency and
concern, and the cab driver's swift, attentive manoeuvres in racing her
to the Roosevelt.
Now the only obvious difference in her appearance is the absence of
cigarettes, but Adams is determined also to resume her old regime of
taking one hour out from Commons'time each day, to walk in as much fresh
air as is possible around the Palaces of Westminster.
''When I was recovering and reflecting on things I suddenly realised
that I had left that routine slip for more than a year simply because of
the volume of work. The daft hours we put in -- often from 9am to 11pm
-- make politicians clear candidates for this sort of crisis.''
Although she downplays the hassles, Adams needs resourceful and
phlegmatic nature to be in good fettle because now there is another
problem round the corner. She prefers to see it as a niggling irritation
but over the past few months there have been persistent rumours that her
candidacy for the next General Election may well be challenged. Ruefully
she says it has been quite a year.
''What the boundary changes have meant in the Renfrewshire area is
that Linwood has come out of Renfrew West and Inverclyde and into
Paisley North, but it only makes up 15% of my constituency. The rest
remains my original seat. So that stuff about a challenge is really only
speculation.
''Under party rules, unless 30% of your seat moves to another
constituency, you have no automatic right to challenge. In other words,
it's just not on to move in because you think the new arrangement is a
better seat.''
Allegations of smear tactics to oust certain party members, and
tip-offs about suspected orchestrated moves to place key Labour
activists in powerful positions at Ferguslie . . . this is also the kind
of fuming chatter which seems to boil up around Paisley North, alleged
intimidation exacerbating argument.
''All I can say is that I've had great support from party officials
and right from the top,'' says Adams. ''If I was facing a real political
challenge then I would take the situation much more seriously. But since
that day I was selected, just over five years ago, the constituency has
never called me to account, and last May it issued a statement saying it
was 100% behind me in the drugs war.''
What does concern her, though, is the bad light cast on the local
party by so much ugly truculence. Adams insists the trouble is being
stirred by only a few individuals who ''for one reason or another have
sought to further their own agendas''.
If the candidacy were snatched from her in a political contest then,
she maintains, she would come to terms with that because: ''That's the
game we're in''. But she adds that she has never operated in order to
build up a personal power bloc. ''I believe that is very, very wrong.
I'm not Irene Adams MP because I'm Irene Adams, but because I'm the
Labour candidate, and I'll never forget that.''
She inherited her husband's seat after his death, at first reluctant
to stand but then persuaded by general approval and the fact that she
had been a member of the Labour Party since the age of 16.
''I had a very good marriage, which I suppose is unusual today, but I
never expected it to end as quickly as that. When I stood for Parliament
I know now that I was still in shock, running on adrenalin, running as
hard as I could to get away from the grief.
''When bereavement happens it is like being hit by a sledgehammer
every morning, but it is true that the terrible pain lessens. You never
get over the trauma but there comes a point when the flashes of memory
change from being sad to being happy.'' Her husband, Adams believes,
would be pleased by the doggedness of her fight.
It is not the squalid street-pusher of drugs whom she is after but
those figures of respectability who, with great stealth, head national
chains of command and are adept at ensuring the casual bystander notices
nothing. Adams is convinced that the bulk of jellies reached communities
not through prescription scams, although they were certainly part of it,
but because of a breakdown in the pharmaceutical network.
Anyone, she says, can register as a pharmaceutical wholesaler. That
done, you then go along to the Department of Trade and Industry, and
request a licence, saying that you have an export order for 5,00,000
temazepam capsules. Equipped with this you move to a manufacturer where
you buy that 5,000,000 at, say, 3p per capsule. Only you never do export
them. ''In fact, we know that on paper Britain exports more temazepam
than it manufactures.''
From now on, licences will be much more heavily policed but Adams
won't rest until all licences are totally monitored.
So, for years what was meant for abroad has been ending up in the
backstreets of home, but not at 3p a time. Instead, the jellies price
would be nearer #4 a capsule. ''To keep that tidy profit in your pocket
you would want to shut up someone like me very quickly.''
But Irene Adams has already proved she can't be easily hushed -- not
by threats, not by illness, not by personal tragedy or cheap onslaughts
on her Commons eligibility. Last time, she may have partly won her seat
on a sympathy vote for the widow, but if she does hold on to it, the
reason now will be conspicuous merit. And then she may come to feel the
healing process is very near complete.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article