IT is difficult to know where to begin with the Blue Nile, to do them
justice, to evaluate their worth, to garland them with praise, to get a
bit emotional and weepy, frankly. Rumours have overtaken them like weeds
during the past five album-less years. A profile that was determinedly
nebulous to begin with has become densely overgrown with conflicting
explanations for the lack of a follow-up to A Walk Across The Rooftops,
the LP of 1984, and arguably one of the albums of this or any other
decade.
Judging them by pop's usual production line standards, some critics
have confused fallow with barren, and have taken that first LP to be not
so much a landmark, more a verdigris'd tombstone.
''In a slough of artistic despond, they burned the master tapes to the
new album,'' people have said, and written. ''They don't do interviews
because it makes them look more mysterious, it's a pose,'' some have
insisted, just as others have said that they haven't given interviews
because they are ''inarticulate.''
Until very recently their public persona has indeed been low-key to
the point of invisibility, studiedly non-intrusive, you might say, at
one point taking the form of their retrieving all their publicity stills
from the press office of their parent record company, Virgin.
So how do we Blue Nile fans know anything about them, about anything?
Zen-daft though it might appear, we know it from the music. We know
everything from the music, and soon we will have new music. On September
11 there will be a new single, Downtown Lights, and on October 9 a new
album, Hats.
Virgin reckons Downtown Lights to be the best thing the group have yet
done, and confidently expect the LP to be a huge seller. ''If we can get
everyone who bought the first album to buy the new one in the first week
of its release, we will have a massive success . . . the Blue Nile will
become visibly successful rather than invisibly successful,'' I was told
by a Virgin spokesperson, who then observed that if the
(expletive-deleted) Cowboy Junkies can sell a million albums worldwide,
then surely the Blue Nile . . .
No Blue Nile fan will be disappointed with their new music, which is
much more than Rooftops, Part 2. Downtown Lights is the most obvious
descendant of their debut LP, while much of the rest of their new album
is less immediately dramatic and more subtly evocative than A Walk
Across The Rooftops. Five years in the making it may have been, and I,
for one, look forward to spending 25 years with Hats.
But who, apart from their music, are the Blue Nile, and does it matter
who they are when they just are?
We meet to thrash things out. Or rather we don't. We meet for them to
be drily absurd (''Roland Barthes is Lionel Barthes' brother . . . he
wrote Oliver and is now in Fine Young Cannibals''), and for me to be
customarily sycophantic and vague . . . dash it, I can't help feeling
that the only proper response is to thank them and then shuffle
backwards out of the room.
Robert Bell, Paul Buchanan, Paul Joseph Moore, you are, are you not,
if that's all right with you . . .
Before I can actually ask them anything, they volunteer the
information that their fave breakfast cereals are Coco Pops and
sugar-free Alpen (''originally it was Special K'').
OK, so you want to play tough . . . what was the first record you
bought?
''An LP of songs from musicals on Woolworth's own Embassy label. Very
cheap. It had The Sound of Music theme on it. Seminal stuff,'' says
Robert.
''I disown it now, but it was a sampler on the Track label with
Thunderclap Newman, the Who, and Jimi Hendrix. This might be more
interesting to people: I threw it and nearly every other record in my
collection out recently. Put them in the dustbin. They were too
depressing even to take down to Oxfam. It's a lean and punchy collection
now,'' says Paul.
''It was The Age of Atlantic sampler. It had Vinegar Joe on it, before
they became unspeakably, individually famous as Elkie Brooks and Robert
Palmer, and we only bought it to test whether or not the record player
we had at home could play stereophonic recordings,'' says Paul Joseph.
What's the point of interviews? What can you tell us?
''These recent interviews have been interesting for us,'' says Paul.
''It's like plugging back in after years in the wilderness. The first
time round, when we were unknown, there was an element of evaluation.
Some of the first interviews were very confrontational: 'So just who do
you think you are?'
''We treated every interviewer equally at first, in hundreds of
interviews, which was completely knackering. We spent the whole of 1986
being busy doing the wrong thing.
''In reality, I spend most of my time being bumbling, bamboozled,
baffled, anything beginning with 'b' in fact, but for 5% of the time we
three gel and rise above ourselves and what we do is better than what we
are.
''Half a decade! I'm five years older than when I started, from a boy
to manhood. Five Christmases! I remember us going to this airless house
in Gullane at the start of 1985, to get away from things and work on the
second LP. It was like something from M. Hulot's Holiday, it was
miserable . . . it was like the Monkees gone totally wrong.
''In the last five years we didn't know or understand what was
happening to us. It was poisonous, we were unhappy, and we were not
coming up with the goods. All we knew was that if you force it, it's
never right.''
This LP, Hats, is . . .
''This LP is not dwelling on bad times.''
Music's purpose . . .
''Music speaks,'' says Paul Joseph, with an enigmatic shrug.
Your favourite colour?
''Coco Pops,'' he says, deadpan.
Like their music, the Blue Nile are incredibly charming, sometimes
difficult, affirmative, elusive, elaborate, simple, blooming brilliant.
They go to our heads and make our hearts beat stronger. What more is
there to say?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article