GEC is to buy the Edinburgh-based Ferranti Defence Systems Group as
well as part of Ferranti International's assets in Italy.
The decision, announced after talks held in considerable secrecy,
caused widespread astonishment, not least in the Commons, where Labour
demanded a referral to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission.
The Department of Trade and Industry said the takeover came within the
realms of the Fair Trading Act and would be reviewed by the
Director-General of Fair Trading. It would then be referred to Trade and
Industry Secretary Mr Nicholas Ridley who would make any decision on
referral.
The cash payment of #310m will transform the fortunes of the Ferranti
group, which lurched into a financial crisis when an estimated #215m was
milked from its American partner International Signal Corporation via
fake contracts. But there is considerable overlapping of defence
interests between Ferranti and GEC's Marconi subsidiary -- leaving the
future of Ferranti's 6300 Scots employees unclear.
The announcement came after Ferranti shares rose by 5p to 34p on news
that Ferranti Defence Systems Group was set to win a share of the #2
billion radar contract for the European Fighter Aircraft. Shares had
tumbled in recent months from a high of 113p after the fraud revelation.
It emerged that Ferranti's share of the radar contract could be less
than #200m, but even that was considered good enough for GEC almost to
double the figure bid by French interest Thomson CSF, which pulled out
last week. A spokesman said: ''This is why we got such a good price from
GEC. The deal was not conditional on the order, but obviously it made
Ferranti more attractive to GEC.''
The discussions with GEC were firmed up only in the past two weeks by
Ferranti chairman Sir Derek Alun Jones. He said the agreement would
greatly strengthen the financial position of the group. ''Ferranti
International will be less dependent on military markets, and will be
one of the UK's largest systems software houses as well as having
attractive businesses in electronic products and weapons systems.''
The remaining Ferranti operations include industrial electronics, with
headquarters at Dalkeith, and with operations also in Livingston and
Dundee as well as in Yarmouth and the US. The important computer systems
are world leaders in software while there is a significant
instrumentation division as well as dynamics which is a turnkey guided
weapons supplier.
Ferranti finance director Charles Scott said the transaction would be
good for employees in Scotland and bring a powerful parent to the
business. He said that if the fighter contract were awarded it would go
to Ferranti Defence Systems. The Ministry of Defence has already said
that Ferranti is the most favoured company.
Defence Procurement Minister Mr Alan Clark, in the Commons, said the
announcement would provide reassurance to concerns expressed by the
German Ministry of Defence over placing the contract with Ferranti,
given its financial difficulties.
He said: ''The MoD welcomes a solution which will maintain the future
of Ferranti Defence Systems as an important and competent supplier. The
companies informed the MoD that discussions were taking place and of the
benefits which they believed should accrue from the bid.''
There are 6300 employees in the division, most in Edinburgh with the
remainder at Bellshill in Lanarkshire. It produces a wide range of
systems for the Ministry of Defence. In the year to March, it brought in
almost #20m of the #21.4m before tax earned by the businesses being sold
to GEC and amounted to 30% of the total Ferranti order book.
However, the future of the Scots workers was unclear. GEC said it was
not yet in a position to issue a statement. Three of Ferranti Defence
Systems' five divisions are in direct competition with GEC products --
cockpit head-up displays for flight information, navigation and guidance
systems, and radars. GEC may keep its existing subsidiaries as
individual entities or merge the operations.
Dr Gavin Strang, Labour MP for Edinburgh East, said the deal should be
supported provided the management structure was right. This had to mean
that Ferranti Defence Systems would incorporate GEC's other airborne
radar interests. ''We would welcome some hard commitment from GEC that
they are going to prove they are prepared to invest heavily in the
long-term future of the Edinburgh-based enterprise.''
Mr James Lupton, of Ferranti's merchant bankers Baring Brothers, said:
''We have obtained a premium price for a premium asset.'' The deal
provided a ''substantial injection of capital'' to the firm enabling
Ferranti to repay a considerable amount of debt. It also means that
plans for the rights issue due to be launched on the Stock Market within
the next 10 days have been abandoned.
The acquisition of Ferranti Defence Systems Group is believed to have
had the prior blessing of the Ministry of Defence and the Government is
expected to be an enthusiastic supporter of a major British company
maintaining a major presence in the defence sector.
In the Commons, Shadow Defence Secretary Mr Martin O'Neill said:
''This amazing news, coming immediately after the clinching of the radar
deal, suggests that the Government was working as much for GEC as they
were for Ferranti.
''Given that this is now the second major acquisition by GEC following
the Plessey deal, one can only wonder whether this latest one will be
referred to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission and whether it will
have an effect on the implementation of the radar contract.''
Mr O'Neill said that one of GEC's subsidiaries was likely to be a
sub-contractor to the German competitor for the radar contract. ''The
relief expressed by all connected with Ferranti may well have been
short-lived.''
The GEC takeover was met with astonishment by union leaders who voiced
fears for the future. GEC, through its Marconi subsidiary, has been a
major competitor with Ferranti in defence work.
Mr Kenny Barnes, joint shop stewards' convener in Edinburgh said:
''There are a considerable number of questions about the way it is going
to operate and fears of rationalisation must come into it very strongly.
There is overlap of interests and that must worry us.''
Mr Jim Muirhead, chairman of the Manufacturing, Science and Finance
union at Ferranti, said: ''We do have a lot of competing interests and I
would be concerned about what GEC would be proposing, especially with
regard to the Scottish end of things.''
0
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article