A minister is taking legal action against a radio station which allegedly cancelled his show because his defence of Christianity was offensive to Muslims.
The Rev Mahboob Masih, a Pakistani-born minister who now preaches in East Kilbride, will take Glasgow station Awaz FM to an employment tribunal later this month after it cut his long-running show.
After six years' unpaid work hosting a religious talk show on the station, Mr Masih says he was the victim of discrimination when Muslim station managers sided against his minority community of Asian Christians.
The dispute arose during a show where Mr Masih and his co-presenter Asif Mall debated with prominent Muslim speaker Zakir Naik, who the pair said had patronised Christianity during a previous speaking appearance.
Asked by Mr Mall whether Jesus Christ was the only prophet to embody "the way, the truth and the life", Mr Naik apparently said he was not, and that all prophets could make this claim.
Mr Mall then accused the guest of having a "superficial knowledge" of holy texts, including the Bible and the Koran, and his comment is said to have offended followers of Islam.
Mr Masih made an on-air apology, he said, reading from a statement prepared by station manager Javed Sattar, but refused to apologise in person at Glasgow's Central Mosque because he did not feel he had anything to apologise for, and feared for his safety should he appear in person. He is now pursuing an employment tribunal on the grounds that he was the victim of discrimination.
"I thought it was completely unfair, and they were discriminating against a minority community, Asian Christians. Their attitude is so arrogant," he said. I experienced this sort of thing as a Christian in Pakistan, but didn't expect it here. This is a secular country, but I am being treated as if I had acted grossly against another community."
Lawyer Paul Diamond, a specialist in religious cases, has been instructed by Mr Masih, and the tribunal is expected to take place in Glasgow later this month.
Station managers yesterday declined to comment on the allegations.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article