Scottish Labour Party's dire straits are laid bare by the latest submissions to the Electoral Commission, which show donations down almost 90% and overall income reduced from more than £1m to less than £400,000.
Figures submitted to the commission show just how far the party has slipped behind the SNP since its political heyday in Scotland.
Labour said there is no significance in the latest figures and its income fluctuates in line with electoral cycles, which is why its overall income from donations fell from £555,976 in 2007 to just £60,523 a year later.
The party points out that its income from membership rose during that year from £114,403 to £137,806, as an argument that the overall drop in income that year from £1,029,538 to £396,195 was not significant.
"There are always spikes in election year and it is also the case that some money raised in Scotland goes to the UK," said a Labour spokesman.
However, it is hard to look at the current figures and not see a pattern of decline, even when compared to the electoral cycle, in comparison to Labour's political rivals north of the border.
Nationalist income reached £2.6m in 2007 and fell to £1.76m in 2008, while donations to the SNP fell from more than £1.2m to £540,000 between 2007 and 2008, demonstrating the gulf that has opened up over Labour in recent years.
The latest UK-wide figures show that the Conservatives outspent Labour by more than £5m in 2008, as Gordon Brown's party made efforts to reduce its massive debts ahead of the general election.
The Electoral Commission figures show that the Conservatives spent £31.9m in 2008, fractionally less than the party's income of £32.4m.
Meanwhile, Labour spent £26.2m of the £34m it raised. Labour's accounts show its net debt was cut from £18.9m to £17.5m last year, aided by a court decision that allowed the party to claim back £4.6m in overpaid VAT as well as interest dating back to 1977.
Outstanding loans from donors who bankrolled Labour's election campaign in 2005 were reduced from £15m to £11.5m over a year. A restructuring plan agreed with the donors a year ago will see Labour paying off these debts at a rate of £2m a year, said party treasurer Jack Dromey.
Labour's income from affiliations, including trade unions, rose from £7.9m to £8m in 2008, but donations dropped from £11.2m to £9.5m and membership subs fell from £4.4m to £3.9m. The party's accounts show a surplus for the second year in succession - of £7.1m, compared to £7.5m in 2007.
Labour paid off around £1m in loans from wealthy backers over the course of 2008, while loans of £2m from former science minister Lord Sainsbury and £300,000 from curry tycoon Sir Gulam Noon were converted into donations.
Tory chairman Eric Pickles said 2008 marked the party's "electoral resurgence" with successes in local government elections, the London mayoral race and by-elections in Henley as well as Crewe and Nantwich.
The party's total income dropped from £33.5m in 2007 to £32.4m, but Conservative Party treasurer Michael Spencer and registered treasurer Ian McIsaac said "given the depth of the recession and the instability in the financial markets this can be regarded as a good achievement".
The 2007 figure was inflated by the conversion of £3m in loans to donations, compared to just £73,000 last year. The treasurers said: "We are working hard to diversify our donor base and reduce our reliance on major donors." They added that the party had a "solid foundation" for the next general election campaign.
The Tories said developments in internet-based fundraising were taking place this year. US President Barack Obama made extensive use of the internet to raise the funds necessary to finance his campaign for the White House.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article