David Cameron has found £50 million from the UK's overstretched budget for events to mark the centenary of the Great War.
That's the Great War of 1914. The war that would end all war. Twenty-five years later it was renamed the First World War as the whole business kicked off again.
In 2014 there will be grants to grow poppies and loads of parades and saluting. Two pupils from every school in England will be sent back to 1914 frontlines to discover how Great War heroes died. But not why they died. UK defence minister Andrew Murrison says: "The commemorations will be very much focused on remembrance, making no judgment on right or wrong."
I hope there are Scottish plans to mark the centenary. Such as a posthumous war crimes trial for Field Marshal Douglas Haig, the butcher of the Somme. Every school should have a showing of the film Oh! What A Lovely War. Every pupil should get a copy of Eric Bogle's song about slow and obscene death in the Green Fields of France. Every child should search military history websites to find out how great-great-grandad died. My grandfather was blown to bits on June 2, 1916 at a place called Zillebeke in Belgium. A German eye-witness reported: "The whole enemy was a cloud of dust and dirt into which timber, tree trunks, weapons and equipment were continuously hurled up, and occasionally human bodies."
As well as reflecting on the futility of the Great War, pupils might learn how British bravery saved the world in the second war which started in 1939. Those were the days when we didn't start wars but were great at finishing them.
By 2014, Britain's pointless war in Afghanistan should be over. Add in £50m worth of poignant remembrances of the Great War and Cameron's unpopular government should get a wee boost in pre-election year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article