Politician;
Born December 21, 1930; Died November 3, 2011.
John Young, who has died aged 80, was a Scottish Conservative politician in local government and, latterly, the Scottish Parliament. A rare breed in that he was a consistent Tory supporter of devolution for Scotland, he remained an elected politician during a period of marked decline for the once powerful Conservative and Unionist Party.
He was born in Glasgow and educated at Hillhead High School and the Scottish College of Commerce, after which he also completed a Glasgow University management course. From 1949-51 Mr Young served in the RAF, thereafter working in a variety of jobs as an export manager, PR consultant, contracts manager and shipping manager.
In local government, he had a remarkable record, serving for an uninterrupted period of 35 years on, at first, Glasgow Corporation (1964-73), then Glasgow District Council (1974-96) and, finally, Glasgow City Council (1995-99). From 1977-79 Mr Young found himself in charge of Glasgow District Council as leader of a minority administration. He was also leader of the opposition from 1979-80, 1988-92 and 1996-98.
At the beginning of his career, Mr Young represented a party that could boast dozens of councillors across the city and half a dozen MPs. As both those figures declined, he held on to his council seat through a combination of hard work and shrewd political tactics. In 1995, for example, he styled himself an “Independent Conservative” in his election leaflets to guard against the unpopularity of John Major’s Government. It appeared to work; Mr Young was re-elected as many other long-serving Conservative councillors across Scotland lost their seats.
Mr Young stood for election to the House of Commons twice, first in Rutherglen in 1966, then in Glasgow Cathcart in 1992. One of a handful of consistently pro-devolution Tories at a time when such a position was anathema to Margaret Thatcher and other party leaders, Mr Young was naturally drawn to the history of the Cathcart Tories, where other Home Rulers had consistently rebelled against the strictly Unionist party line. He even penned a short book (of which he was very proud), A History of the Cathcart Conservative Association 1918-1993, covering this interesting story.
A member of Sir Malcolm Rifkind’s commission charged with devising a policy prospectus for the new Scottish Parliament, Mr Young also became the first Tory candidate to be selected to fight a constituency – Eastwood – in the run-up to the 1999 elections, something that drew media criticism given he was approaching his 69th birthday. Although he managed a creditable result in a once-solid Scottish Tory heartland, he arrived in Parliament as a list MSP for the West of Scotland.
He was the Scottish Parliament’s second-oldest member (the oldest was the SNP’s Winnie Ewing) and served as his party’s deputy spokesman on transport and environment, as well as its member of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body, which oversaw Parliamentary housekeeping. In Tory group leader David McLetchie’s 2001 reshuffle, however, Mr Young lost his front-bench post.
Animal welfare, particularly that of dogs, was his big political passion, and he attempted to reform legislation governing the use of fireworks to that end. He was also secretary of the Scottish-South African Society (1986-88) during the twilight years of Apartheid, a long-standing member of the Conservative Friends of Israel, a vice-chairman of the Scottish Pakistani Association and a member of the Strathclyde Passenger Transport Authority.
In the Scottish Parliament, Mr Young also served as a member of the Audit and Justice 2 Committees, but in reality he was reaching the end of his career and did not contest the 2003 Scottish Parliament elections. “If there were such a thing as testimonial matches for politicians,” assessed one biographer, “he would deserve one.”
A convivial man and, in his prime, a fine debater, John Young died following a long illness. His wife Doris predeceased him and he is survived by his son Peter.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article