The A83 we know today, suspended on a now unstable precipitous hillside as it approaches the Rest and Be Thankful summit, was built between 1937 and 1941 for very different conditions ("A83 shut again as landslide causes chaos", The Herald, August 2 & Letters, August 3).
It is not fit for purpose any more and never will be so it is entirely sensible that the Scottish Government, which has spent a huge sum of money over the past five years merely keeping it open, is deciding on substantial changes on the section leading up to the summit.
A much more radical look at the problem suggests several other longer-term solutions.
Sixty years ago that road was carrying less than one-tenth of the volume of traffic it carries today and in those days a substantial proportion of human cargo and freight was delivered into Argyll by boats and freighters. Virtually everything, including the daily mail, came by sea as it did to dozens of piers all about the Clyde estuary and the long fingers of sea lochs connected to it.
In a sensible country (such as Norway, for instance) we would be looking at a multitude of well equipped ferries criss-crossing the west Highlands and Islands, taking vast amounts of traffic off the roads.
Were the geography of the whole of the UK in anyway similar to the geography of most of Scotland we wouldn't be having this debate. I'm sure if that was the case massive funding provision would be automatically provided for ferries which are actually an alternative and a more efficient part of a sensible transport network. Ferries should be treated like roads and funded accordingly and if vehicle carrying ferries ran into Argyll from the mainland to places like Campbeltown, Dunoon and Tighnabruaich (for onward journeys to Islay and the southern isles) you would take half the traffic off the A83.
Dave McEwan Hill,
1 Tom Nan Ragh,
Dalinlongart, Sandbank, Argyll.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article