THAT Edward Snowden was elected rector of the University of Glasgow demonstrates the importance of freedom of expression to its students.
But academic freedom carries with it responsibilities. Today the University of Glasgow greeted the Israeli Ambassador "as a welcome guest to the School of Law". It did so under an unprecedented cloak of secrecy.
We are saddened by the invitation and believe it should not have been extended. The state of Israel has effectively silenced legitimate expression by Palestinians through limiting their movement, appropriating their land and violating their rights, in ways that are well documented. Gaza is in ruins, Israeli universities are being built on land which has been settled illegally. Israeli Embassy security are today on campus. This puts staff involved in projects in the Occupied Palestinian Territories at risk.
The setting aside of the normal decision-making procedures about events has encouraged hurried protest. The visit risks damaging existing relationships which staff across the university have built carefully with groups in Palestine and elsewhere internationally, who will be distressed to hear about this visit.
In this we have a concern for the postgraduate students in the School of Law. We understand that as of Friday lunchtime, students did not know who would be speaking. It is seriously concerning that students who may wish to follow the National Union of Students position on the Call for an Academic Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions are being denied the information which would make it possible for them to do so.
It is a matter of grave concern to us that students who were invited to attend the event at the University of Glasgow were not given the necessary time to prepare for the seminar, and to consider, analyse and discuss the implications. Instead we believe the withholding of information will seriously disadvantage students and place them in a position of vulnerability.
We believe this constitutes a failure in our duties as academics. It is our view that part of the responsibility for the conduct of academic freedom is that time and preparation need to be accorded for reading, preparation and debate, most especially in difficult matters where there is considerable, known disagreement. When this is withheld there is a tendency for chaotically organised positions to emerge and for students to be left at a serious disadvantage. Whilst the School of Law has urged discretion it is not the stated position of the guest. It is a stated position of the Israeli Ambassador, when faced with protest, to engage in even more "active reaching out and making our case".
Either senior management in the university and decision-makers in the School of Law have stumbled into a deadly conflict and diplomatic game, and have been played, or they have taken the side of a powerful aggressor. The decision-makers and university leaders have breached the trust of their staff and students with respect to the responsibilities that rest with them as stewards of something as precious as the right to academic freedom.
Alison Phipps, Professor of Languages and Intercultural Studies; Sarah Craig, Senior Lecturer, School of Law;
Rebecca Kay, Professor of Russian Gender Studies, School of Political and Social Sciences; Vassiliki Kolocotroni, Senior Lecturer, School of Critical Studies; Julie McAdam, lecturer, School of Education; Willy Maley, Professor of English Literature, School of Critical Studies; Maud Anne Bracke, Senior Lecturer in Modern European History, School of Humanities, University of Glasgow; Jane Goldman, Reader in English Literature, School of Critical Studies; Kate O'Donnell, Professor of Primary Care Research and Development, Institute of Health and Wellbeing; Andrew Smith, Reader in Sociology, School of Social and Political Sciences, Keith Hammond, School of Law; Bridget Fowler, Emeritus Professor of Sociology, School of Social and Political Sciences; Francesca Stella, Lord Kelvin Adam Smith Research Fellow, School of Social and Political Sciences; Roona Simpson, Lecturer in Social Science Research Methods, School of Social and Political Sciences; Andrea Williamson, Clinical Senior University Teacher, General Practice and Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow; Teresa Piacentini, Lecturer in Sociology, School of Social and Political Sciences; Simon Murray, Senior Lecturer in Theatre Studies, School of Culture and Creative Arts; Maria-Daniella Dick, Lecturer in English Literature, School of Critical Studies; Katja Frimberger, Research Associate, School of Education; Evelyn Arizpe, Senior Lecturer in Education, School of Education; Graham Watt, Professor of General Practice; Neil Davidson, Lecturer in Sociology, School of Social and Political Sciences, all University of Glasgow,
c/o 35 Turnberry Road, Partickhill, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article