SO much for David Cameron's firm assurances after Eastleigh that Conservative policy would not swerve to the right to counter Ukip's electoral threat ("Scots human rights chief condemens Tory EU threat", The Herald, March 4).
The announcement of benefit cuts for EU immigrants (with the presumably attractive side-effect of further restricting benefit entitlements for some UK citizens) looks suspiciously like a desperate sop to the Ukip vote-stealers.
The decision by the Prime Minister and senior Conservatives to inflame public fears about immigration from Romania and Bulgaria when restrictions are lifted next year is cynical and economically nonsensical. 2014 is not going to be a repeat of 2004, when emigration suddenly became possible for ambitious workers from all over Eastern Europe, and the UK was one of a handful of countries not to impose "transitional restrictions". With Romania and Bulgaria, full restrictions were put in place when they joined the EU in 2007; but in any case, virtually anyone who wanted to migrate from these countries did so years ago.
The Government's own figures show that even in the years after 2004, when EU migration levels were high, the UK economy proved flexible enough to absorb newcomers without significant impacts on other workers. EU migrants make a substantial net contribution to the Treasury's coffers, and are much less likely than British-born people to claim out-of-work benefits.
It is perverse to complain about a possible influx of educated, motivated young people who will certainly benefit the country's economy. If the Government were honest, it would spend its energy explaining the facts rather than perverting them for political gain. Today's fresh outbreak of little-Englander xenophobia is shameful.
John M Brand,
Chairman,
European Movement,
12b Cumberland Street SE Lane,
Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article