THE Tobacco Retailers Alliance (TRA) is promoting a disturbing story of one in 10 corner shops at risk of closing due to sales lost to illegal tobacco ("Tobacco smugglers blamed for corner shop woes", The Herald, August 8).
Yet this dramatic claim falls apart under examination.
After a long campaign telling their members that counterfeit tobacco is damaging local shops, the TRA asked shopkeepers whether they thought their shop was at risk of closing due to counterfeit and smuggled tobacco. We are not told how they made sure of an unbiased sample or whether they just relied on their existing friends and contacts. Of those who responded, 92 were from Scotland. So the dramatic "one in 10" headline is based on nine individuals' personal opinion.
Why would the TRA make so much of such flimsy evidence, and then use it to argue against the level of tax on cigarettes? Why would their spokesperson claim that tobacco smuggling "continues to worsen" when the figures from Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs show the illegal market has been declining for a decade?
Perhaps the answer is that the Tobacco Retailers Alliance is paid for by British American Tobacco, Imperial Tobacco and Japan Tobacco, three of the world's largest tobacco companies. Funnily enough, a quick glance at their website makes it perfectly clear that the TRA's primary role is to argue against regulation of tobacco.
If only the tobacco companies felt able to come forward and argue their own case, rather than hide behind front groups, then we might at least be able to have a more honest debate.
Sheila Duffy,
Chief Executive,
ASH Scotland,
8 Frederick Street,
Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article