MY father committed suicide in his mid-80s by overdosing on paracetamol.
Death by this means is prolonged and painful. Such individuals, according to your correspondents, should typically have the right to be assisted in terminating their lives (Letters, March 11 and 12). However, three other important rights exist which weigh against such an opinion.
How much would I have given for an extra half hour of my father's company, even if he did not want to communicate? And how much would his grandchildren have loved to have known him more? "Blood is thicker than water" expresses the strength of family bonds. Assisted suicide removes certain natural family rights.
For about three decades Dad cut himself off from normal societal contacts, refusing even to have a GP. But since "no man is an island", some still knew and respected him. In special ways society becomes more humane through the severely disabled, chronically depressed and suicidal. And so John Donne's poem continues: "Any man's death diminishes me; because I am involved in mankind."
At university my father turned from Christianity to humanism. Despite that, it is reasonable to suppose that there are also divine rights: 88% of the world's population believe in the existence of a deity. These too are infringed in an untimely death and are expressed by Job as he faced the loss of all his children: "The Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord."
Part of being human is to have responsibilities as well as rights.
Rev David EC Ford,
7 Foxes Grove, Lenzie.
WHERE I am at one with Dr Stephen Hutchison (Letters, March 11) is that we both want the best palliative care for our patients. Where we disagree is that he wants to deny terminally ill patients the additional choice of assisted dying.
He says that it is unethical, but what is ethical about refusing a dying patient's request for assistance to die when the best palliative care has failed? He says that it is unsafe, but scrutiny of the detailed provisions of the bill answer these concerns.
He says most doctors oppose assisted suicide, but this is open to debate. He cites for example the Royal College of General Practitioners' opposition. But though there are more than 60,000 GPs in the UK, the number responding to the RCGP survey on assisted suicide was only 1700. In other words less than 3% of all GPs responded. Clearly the RCGP cannot claim to represent the views of all GPs on this issue.
There are good reasons to support the bill and I do hope that Dr Hutchison will reconsider his opposition.
Dr Jack A Macfie,
6 Albert Terrace, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article