Not the sweaty, over-the-top action flick starring Kevin Costner as a rugged kind of Mad Max on water in search of dry land after the polar ice caps have melted.
But rather, my local swimming pool, Leith Waterworld, which had its own quieter apocalypse when it closed its doors for the last time last weekend, as a result of a financial balancing act by Edinburgh Council, which part-paid for the Commonwealth Pool refurbishment with this closure.
Even as I write this I'm still wearing the pink wristband from my last visit. When my son asks why, we go through a sad old conversation about how we can't go back there again and he asks if we can go to another swimming pool, and I say, yes, though I struggle to think of one which will cause him such delight.
On Saturday, the pool was at capacity, with queues trailing outside the door, customers fighting for changing cubicles, and ourselves, choosing, as a family, to get changed in a corner by the lockers. Leith Waterworld has never been cheap to run, requiring, as it does, a plethora of life guards to cover the difficult sight lines, caused by the elaborate design of its water-runs, flumes, and secluded pool areas. That has long been the case put forward by Edinburgh Leisure. But without doubt it has given immeasurable pleasure to families from far and wide, and been an important force, in our area, in fostering the idea of active family time. Almost every parent I know is familiar with the chorus of pester power that builds up to any visit. An energetic campaign called Splashback developed in the last few months to try to save it. The Leith literati – from Irvine Welsh to David Greig – gave support. But this week, the doors are bolted, and soon the wrecking crew are set to come in and gut the building in preparation for sale. Where is Kevin Costner when you need him?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article