Do SNP MSPs truly believe it is acceptable to manipulate the business of Scottish parliament committees just to make life easier for ministers?
There has been disquiet for years about the way in which the SNP have used their majority at Holyrood to stop committees acting in any way that might prove embarrassing for ministers but, if anything, the tendency may be worsening as the independence referendum approaches.
The primary role of Scottish parliament committees is to hold the Scottish Government to account. That role is not just something to occupy MSPs between constituency surgeries and First Minister's Questions; it is absolutely essential to the proper functioning of democracy in Scotland. With a unicameral parliament, committees perform a vital function in testing legislation and interrogating government policies. MSPs sitting on committees are supposed to put their political leanings to one side but there have been mounting claims that this duty is less important to many SNP MSPs than sparing their political masters any discomfort.
Accusations have been made that SNP members of the Public Petitions Committee have sought to prevent any discussion of constitutional referendums for oil-rich Shetland, Orkney and the Western Isles because it could prove awkward for Alex Salmond. Quite apart from the farcical notion of MSPs who support Scottish independence seeking to suppress discussion of independence for Scotland's island groups, any SNP member acting in this way would be failing to live up to their responsibilities as committee members. Equally worrying is the suggestion that constitutional expert Matt Qvortrup was called before the finance committee by SNP members only to be disinvited after submitting written evidence that did not quite stay on message from the SNP's perspective (Mr Qvortrup noted that there was no guarantee of EU or UN entry for an independent Scotland).
Last week, Tory, Labour and Liberal Democrat members of Holyrood's Public Audit Committee refused to endorse the committee's official report on the setting up of Police Scotland, voted through by the SNP's committee majority, because their criticisms of the Government had been removed from it. Holding a joint press conference on Tuesday, they said a "cult of slavishness and obedience" had been imposed on SNP backbenchers. The Scottish Government's "failures and inconsistencies" were being suppressed, they argued.
While Labour were known for imposing strong discipline in the ranks while in coalition with the Liberal Democrats, there was not the same level of disquiet about committees properly fulfilling their duties during their tenure in office.
The SNP party leadership and MSPs must take responsibility for this. To dismiss accusations about controlling behaviour as posturing by their political opponents is simply not good enough. Such behaviour does not support the proper functioning of the parliamentary process and has no place in it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article