By Stephen Naysmith
social affairs correspondent
The Scottish Labour Party's policies weren't the issue at the last general election, leadership candidate Ken MacIntosh claims. No single policy, nor indeed the manifesto as a whole cost them victory. "People wouldn't even listen to us," he said, at his campaign launch.
He is right and his framing of the issue is surely more constructive than its inversion, as advanced by former leader Jim Murphy and others, that SNP support was akin to that of a quasi-religious cult.
Voters in Scotland, once tribally loyal to Labour, have stopped listening to the party to such an extent that the phrase 'Labour heartlands' can only now be used with the prefix 'historic'. Regaining the ear of the voters will be no small task.
Kezia Dugdale will launch her bid to lead the party today, and the election will be decided on a one-member one-vote system under reformed rules put forward by Mr Murphy last week. This reform can only be the beginning.
The crucial question is how much autonomy Scottish Labour should seek from the UK party. It is the lack of anything convincingly Scottish about Scottish Labour that has, more than anything else, led it into two consecutive Holyrood defeats and a general election wipe-out.
Outgoing leader Mr Murphy insists the Scottish Party should not be separate from the UK party. But it cannot continue to be so slavish to the party in London, especially when the economic dominance of London is so unhelpful to Scotland, and especially when the party is so weak in the UK that London is the only place it remains politically dominant.
Mr MacIntosh proposes a hybrid solution - an autonomous party making a positive choice to remain within the UK Labour Party. It will be interesting to see what Ms Dugdale has to say on tackling Scottish Labour's status as a' branch office'. What Mr MacIntosh is proposing would seem to be the bare minimum if the party is to assert its own personality.
Scottish Labour has to take a new approach to the SNP. The attitude of party activists has appeared both complacent and offensive to too many voters for too long. The assumption that after a flirtation with 'the nationalists' the Scottish electorate would return to the Labour fold. The inability to see that it was on policies and competence, not the promise of independence, that the SNP was pulling ahead. These have been the fatal errors of Labour strategy, disproven finally when despite voting against independence, the public elected SNP MPs across the country.
Labour almost certainly faces more pain at the Scottish Parliament elections next year and there will be no instant recovery. But Scottish politics needs a strong opposition, an alternative social democratic voice to represent those who voted to stay within the union, and to challenge the SNP in areas where its record is questionable such as further education and the NHS.
Whoever emergesto lead Scottish Labour, there must be an end to talk of cults, to the sour-grapes disapproval of Nicola Sturgeon's ability to fill stadia, and a less patronising engagement with the views and demands of voters.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article