AS JOSEPH Chamberlain put it in 1886 and Harold Wilson is said to have paraphrased in 1964: "In politics, there is no use looking beyond the next fortnight."
And so it has proved for David Cameron. The comeback kid who took his jacket off, loosened his tie and rolled up his sleeves to achieve an outright Conservative victory in May has come up against the grim reality of his own party in June. The Prime Minister may not yet be, like John Major 12 years ago, railing against the Eurosceptic "bastards" in his Cabinet, but you sense the day may not be far off.
It actually began to unravel almost instantly when Mr Cameron personally briefed lobby journalists during a G7 visit to Bavaria that he would sack any Minister who wanted to campaign to quit the EU. The following day he had to half-deny a story of his own making, insisting he was only demanding Cabinet loyalty during the re-negotiation process, assuming his prospects of success are worthy of that term.
The trouble for the Prime Minister is that while he may have an unknown quantity of recalcitrants in his Cabinet, he has an abundance on his back benches, some of them formidable former Ministers and leadership contenders in their day such as David Davis, who accused the Premier of turning a "decent debate into an acrimonious argument" and of lacking confidence in his own negotiating skills.
The first shoots of this party division are now flowering, just a month after the General Election, with fights already over the referendum date and the rules for purdah during the final days of that campaign.
Curiously, this newspaper, historically and consistently in favour of EU membership, finds itself siding with the rebels and their SNP supporters in both of these conflicts.
Tory rebels are determined to block Mr Cameron's frankly absurd notion that there should be no purdah in the final four weeks of the EU referendum. Purdah exists for a reason, to deny the Government of the day undue influence during a campaign's endgame. It is a solid principle which we support. It has obviously been made more complicated by the existence of our devolved governments and administrations across these islands, but the concept is sound, even when the issue is as over-arching as Europe.
The EU referendum plans also run up against another frankly absurd notion, that the date of the Euro plebiscite might coincide with next May's elections for Edinburgh, Cardiff and Belfast.
We are in the middle of a complex debate in Scotland about whether our next parliament should be of three or five years to avoid a General Election clash, and along come a blithe suggestions that this same date might be hijacked for the EU referendum.
It's not only constitutionally disrespectful, it's also politically muddle-headed, given that our First Minister has pencilled in this referendum as her preferred next constitutional crisis on which to justify another independence referendum, and her predecessor, Alex Salmond, now has full rein at Westminster to be mischief-maker in-chief.
In the recent staring contest over full fiscal autonomy, the SNP appear to have won with the Conservatives blocking it instead of daring it. Mr Salmond playing tactical fast and loose on the EU issue with Tory rebels is a nightmare for Mr Cameron.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article