Another day and another survey highlights the discrimination women still face in many workplaces.
The latest analysis highlights a gender pay gap at management levels, based on a survey of more than 4,000 professionals in Scotland.
The new data shows a discrepancy of £8,347 between the pay of female and male managers. This divide,which shows senior women employees earning approximately three-quarters of what their male counterparts do, is not inevitable.
Why is it that so many women who have left to raise families fall behind in terms of career and salary? In many professions it can only really be the result of institutional prejudice.
Women are plainly penalised for taking time out to have a family. Yet for every woman who genuinely falls behind by missing out on important experience, say, or career development opportunities, there are surely several more who simply penalised for not being ever-present. These workers can perform just as competently as the men who have not had career breaks for parenting but whose advantage is purely in terms of time served.
This is another way of saying lower levels of pay for women managers can rarely be justified. Such a view is shared by Ann Francke, chief executive of the Chartered Management Institute, which carried out the survey. Old-fashioned pay policies that put the emphasis on time served should be stamped out, she says.
At the moment, however, the figures suggest that when women return to the workforce, the deficit only worsens.
While the CMI survey applies to managers, we know from other research that women suffer across the whole of the employment market.
Women are paid 19.1 per cent less than men on average, according to a report from the Fawcett Society this week, while the increasingly tenuous nature of employment in the current jobs market seems to be particularly exploitative of women.
Since the start of the recession almost one million more women have taken on low-paid, insecure jobs.
This is the other side of the barriers placed in the way of women advancing at work. The Fawcett Society claims one fifth of women currently earning the minimum wage have degrees.
The principle that cannot be questioned is that women at all levels who do the same job as men should receive the same salary. Increasingly, where this is not the case, women are able to seek redress through the courts. But it should not be necessary. Employers who have not already examined whether such anomalies exist within their own organisations should make it a priority to do so.
Businesses and individual men have a role to play in encouraging and developing female managers, the CMI suggests, while employers should also be benchmarking their progress in equal pay and promotion.
The role models and the evidence are there to demonstrate the abilities of women in the workplace. Employers must make it a priority not just to reward that fairly, but to prove they are doing so.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article