Another month, another damning report on British banking.
This time, the bank in question, Barclays, asked for it. In the wake of the scandal over the rigging of the inter-bank lending rate, which resulted in a £290 million fine and the departure of the chief executive Bob Diamond, Barclays commissioned a review of its operations by Anthony Salz. Its publication yesterday made "uncomfortable reading" for the chairman, Sir David Walker, but there would have been little point in the £17m exercise if it had not done so.
In many ways, the Salz report is a re-telling of an old story we know only too well in relation to RBS and HBOS: rapid expansion in the years leading up to the financial crisis produced cultural change. As a result of business practices which rested on uncertain foundations, there was an over-emphasis on short-term financial performance, reinforced by a bonus and pay culture that rewarded money-making over serving the interests of customers and clients. Similar conclusions about the running of HBOS are expected from the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards investigation into its failure. Severe censure of the former chairman and two former chief executives, who many feel have so far escaped too lightly, is anticipated.
Mr Salz's report, which is highly critical of Barclays, will be welcomed by bank customers because it links pay and the behaviour of some individuals. It finds: "We could not avoid concluding that pay contributed significantly to a sense among a few that they were somehow unaffected by the ordinary rules. A few investment bankers seemed to lose a sense of proportion and humility." This shows there is a problem with bonuses and public criticism is not merely the result of envy but concern about financial stability. Mr Salz clearly identifies an urgent need to change the culture so that risky behaviour and inappropriate sales are not rewarded to restore trust. This challenges the claim by bankers that a curb on bonuses will cause banks to leach their top talent: at Barclays, the top 70 executives receiving up to 35% more than their peers at rival banks. The reward system must be overhauled at every level and in every financial institution.
Barclays says business practices adopted earlier this year are substantially aligned with the Salz review's recommendations but this sounds hollow following the news last month that 428 staff received more than £1m in 2012. This is a reduction from the 728 who were previously paid bonuses of this scale but there appears to be a reluctance to completely jettison the high-reward culture, with an indication only last month that long-term incentives are to continue.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article