Only five of the 34 judges who sit in Scotland's High Court and Court of Session are women.
It would appear that, 37 years after the Sex Discrimination Act, the top echelons of the legal profession in Scotland continue to discriminate against women.
After centuries in which judges and sheriffs were appointed by the Lord Advocate, a system that was inevitably influenced by the old boys' network, the Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland was established in 2002 to make the selection system more open, fair and transparent. One of its strategic objectives is to encourage appropriate diversity in the range of individuals available for selection.
That it has so conspicuously failed to do so must be a source of deep disappointment and frustration to the large number of able women practising law at various levels in Scotland. When Lady Cosgrove was appointed Scotland's first female judge 16 years ago, she naturally expected others to follow her on to the bench in a trickle-up effect. With 80% of newly qualified lawyers now women, the pace of change must be accelerated and not only for the sake of equality in the legal profession.
As Lady Cosgrove stated in her address to the Scottish Young Lawyers Association yesterday, the public cannot have confidence in a judicial system in which half the population is under-represented. The importance of this is recognised at the highest levels: part of the initial remit of the appointments board was to consider ways of recruiting a judiciary representative of the communities served.
Perhaps with the high-profile appointment of Elish Angiolini as Lord Advocate, Scotland's most senior law officer, six years ago, there was an assumption that the glass ceiling had been breached. If so, complacency has done a disservice to women with the ability to become sheriffs or judges. However, gender imbalance is the result of practical difficulties as well as what Lady Hale, the only female judge in the UK Supreme Court, described as "an unspoken officer- class mentality in the selection of judges".
Lady Cosgrove's call for a less rigid qualification process, more flexible hours and part-time working may be regarded askance in Parliament House but it is the failure to recognise the reality of women's lives that is unacceptable.
A similar cause for disappointment is the proportion of women in the Scottish Parliament. In 2003, 40% of MSPs were women, giving hope that the combination of a parliament nearer home, family-friendly hours and the additional member system could lead to a legislature with a gender balance close to 50/50. However, in 2007 women gained only 33% of the seats and the proportion is now 35%. In local government only 21% of councillors are women.
As with the judiciary, it is vital that the Parliament and councils reflect the communities served.
The time is long overdue for political parties and all Scottish institutions to recognise that a gender balance is not only fair but also beneficial. There can be no place for antediluvian sexism.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article