It's been a good week for ...
Vikings
Our erstwhile Scandic invaders have had their reputation cleared.
The image of Vikings which painted them as a band of marauding sex criminals has been somewhat dispelled, thanks to a new study of Britain's genetic make-up.
While Vikings may well have done their fair share of pillaging, the genes they have left behind suggest there was little sex involved.
Analysis of thousands of DNA samples from the UK, continental Europe and Scandinavia show a surprising lack of Viking genes in England, despite the Norsemen once occupying much of the country.
Even in Orkney, which was a part of Norway from 875 to 1472, the Vikings contributed only about 25 per cent of the current gene pool.
The Vikings, from Norway, Sweden and Denmark, carried out extensive raids and occupations across wide areas of northern and central Europe between the eighth and late 11th centuries.
The researchers, led by scientists from Oxford University and the Wellcome Trust, wrote in the journal Nature: "While many of the historical migration events leave signals in our data, they have had a smaller effect on the genetic composition of UK populations than has sometimes been argued."
So, Vikings were really nice guys, then, who just indulged in a bit of pillaging.
It's been a bad week for ... Vikings
The findings support previous research from the University of Oslo suggesting that Viking men were family-orientated and not that interested in the British women they conquered.
Rather than Viking raiding parties consisting wholly of macho men, researchers found that significant numbers of women, and possibly whole families, travelled on the longboats.
This explains much. It wasn't that Erik the Red and his mates were chaste gentlemen when it came to a pillaging session, it's just that their better halves had them under the thumb.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article