The effects of COVID-19 continue to wreak havoc to the economy.
The latest ONS data points to around 1 in 5 Scottish companies currently closed or paused trading. Of those still operating, around half have seen turnover fall by over 20%.
Sadly, we are beginning to see the costs of the shutdown with business closures and job losses across the country. Last week we had the warning that four out of five engineering firms expect to cut jobs in the next six months.
Predicting the outlook for the next few months is still highly uncertain.
One thing that we can say is that we are in for a long haul. The government’s route-map points to ‘four phases’ with restrictions remaining in place – in some form – for months to come.
As a result, government will need to provide lifeline support for many businesses for some time yet. The Chancellor’s response – particularly the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) – was the right course of action. But the decision to shut-down businesses was arguably the easy, albeit costly, part. Starting them back-up again will require great care.
Indeed, it will only be once our economy emerges from its hibernation that many risks will crystallise. When firms work out what’s left of their customer base, many will find that their pre-COVID business model is simply no longer viable.
Government will therefore have to tread a fine line between ongoing support where needed, but also helping businesses to get back trading again.
Last week’s proposals for the CJRS, which will see a gradual withdrawal of support and greater flexibilities, are designed to do just that. Other measures, such as supporting furloughed workers to look for new jobs in growth businesses, will be needed too.
Not all businesses will require the same level or type of support. Some, for example in hospitality, are likely to require longer-term financial help. For others, the best form of support will be less about cash and more about practical measures to help plug breaks in supply chains, close gaps in logistics, or invest in new technologies and skills.
Government cannot do all the heavy lifting. Innovative private financing approaches will be required to address the £100bn of unsustainable debt estimated to have built up in the corporate sector since the crisis began.
This response will require coordinated action across government and regulators. Here in Scotland, this will mean that policymakers on all sides of the political spectrum will need to switch from simply asking for more funding or more powers and look at priorities within the Scottish Budget. Budgets across areas of enterprise and economic development have been under pressure for years. Yes, as a result of austerity, but also because of political priorities elsewhere.
A debate about what we economists call ‘opportunity cost’ – where else public money could be spent instead – will be more important than ever during the recovery phase.
It is only natural that some discussion has turned to imagining a better long-term future, with catchy phrases such as ‘build-back better’. This is all well and good. But we cannot lose sight of the seriousness or the urgency of the situation now. Helping get our economy get back-up off the ground, safely and securely, will be crucial for our long-term prosperity.
In looking to the future, there is one important take-away from all this. These last few months have highlighted the link between our economy and, the in-vogue phrase, ‘wellbeing’. Yes, there are debates to be had about the nature of growth, how it is distributed, and its sustainability. But the importance of a prosperous economy for our collective ‘wellbeing’ – one that provides financial security for families, creates opportunities for our young people and supports innovative and vibrant businesses – cannot be overestimated.
Professor Graeme Roy is director of the University of Strathclyde's Fraser of Allander Institute.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel