IT is easy to understand the wish of Scottish Engineering’s chief executive to focus on something that can be done to improve the sector’s lot, amid the “chaotic” Brexit situation.
Paul Sheerin says it does not feel as if the business community’s “protests” over Brexit have achieved any positive impact. He believes a drive to boost productivity could, in contrast, yield positive results.
Read More:EU did not blink and end of the world as we know it would be awful
That said, he does – in terms of his overall assessment of Scottish engineering companies’ worries about the UK leaving the European Union and one alarming anecdote – highlight the damage being done already by the Brexit chaos. Such contributions to the debate remain crucial, even if they are falling on deaf ears at Westminster.
Mr Sheerin cited the example of one Scottish engineering company which had been supplying a Dutch business. He noted the arrangement, started fairly recently, had been going well but that the Dutch company had ended it because of fears over Brexit.
Read More: Engineering growth slows amid Brexit fear
He said: “The Dutch company informed them, ‘We are concerned about the manifestations of Brexit, so we are going to keep our supply chain on the European mainland’. They [the Dutch company] didn’t know for certain what the impact was going to be but they wanted to play safe.”
Read More: Ian McConnell: Do not be fooled by these two Brexit tall tales from the Conservatives
This may be just one story, but it would seem almost certain there are many others.
The UK Government should reflect on this, especially its Brexit-minded members who seem most unperturbed by the idea of a cliff-edge departure from the EU next March.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here