BUSINESSES have been warned that excluding women from senior jobs is not just hurting their employees' career prospects - it can be harmful to the company's productivity.
Despite a series of efforts from firms and the Government to improve the prospects of women in the workplace, many companies treat it as a gender issue instead of a problem for the business, consultancy group Advanced Boardroom Excellence (ABE) suggests.
"It is blatantly ridiculous - and must be recognised as such - that with male and female working populations that are broadly numerically equal, women are still a minority group by the time they reach the most senior levels of organisations," said chairman Helen Pitcher.
The organisation's poll of 70 senior women in business found that none described themselves as ambitious, instead recounting their careers as a series of accidents rather than a carefully choreographed climb up the corporate ladder.
A fifth of those polled said they wished they had more self-confidence, which the researchers said was a symptom of companies not properly managing the women they employ.
"The playing field may be level, but sometimes it looks as though we are playing two different games on the same field," they said.
In spite of the problems, a majority of the women polled (52 per cent) were against imposing formal gender quotas on senior jobs. Just 32 per cent supported quotas to force change at the top and 16 were undecided.
The Government has backed a voluntary target of having women in 25 per cent of board seats at large listed companies by 2015, up from 12.6 per cent in 2010.
Headhunting firm Egon Zehnder went further yesterday, pledging to play its part in getting 25 female bosses of FTSE 100 firms by 2025 - up from the current total of five.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article