For the first time since the introduction of biotech/ genetically modified (GM) crops almost two decades ago, developing countries have grown more hectares of them than industrialised countries, contributing to food security and further alleviating poverty in some of the world's most vulnerable regions.
Developing nations planted 52% of the global GM crops in 2012, up from 50% a year earlier, a report out yesterday by the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA).
Last year also marked an unprecedented 100-fold rise in the area planted, with GM crops now accounting for 170 million hectares up from 1.7 million in 1996, when GM crops were first commercialised.
"This makes biotech crops the fastest adopted crop technology in recent history," said Clive James, veteran author of the annual report and founder and chairman of ISAAA.
"This growth is contrary to the prediction of critics, who, prior to the commercialisation of the technology in 1996, prematurely declared biotech crops were only for industrial countries and would never be accepted and adopted by developing countries," he added.
A record 17.3 million farmers grew GM crops globally in 2012, up 600,000 from a year earlier. Over 90% of these farmers – more than 15 million – were small-scale, resource-poor farmers in developing countries.
China, India, Brazil, Argentina and South Africa grew 78.2 million hectares, or 46%, of global GM crops in 2012.
For the fourth consecutive year, Brazil was the engine of growth globally in 2012. Brazil ranks second only to the US in worldwide GM crop planting, growing at a year-to-year record 6.3 million hectares, or a substantial 21%, to reach 36.6 million hectares in 2012 compared to 30.3m in 2011.
The US continued to be the lead country with 69.5 million hectares, with an average 90% adoption across all crops.
The Cumberland and Dumfriesshire Farmers Mart had 30 prime cattle forward at the Dumfries sale on Wednesday. Bullocks sold to 209.5p per kg and averaged 201.1p, while heifers peaked at 236.5p and levelled at 214.1p.
There were 51 OTM cattle presented in the rough ring with beef cows averaging 134.3p and dairy cows levelling at 119.7p.
The firm also sold 774 prime hoggs to a top of £88.50 per head and 188p per kg to average 163p.
The 637 cast sheep forward saw heavy ewes sell to £108.50 for Texels and average £54.11, while light ewes peaked at 361.50 for Lleyns and levelled at £27.56.
United Auctions sold 929 store bullocks at Stirling on Wednesday to a top of 275p and an average of 217.5p (+3p on the week), while 500 store heifers peaked at 235.3p and levelled at 212.2p (+0.5p).
In the rough ring 154 cast cows averaged 141,6p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article