CLYDESDALE Bank chief executive David Thorburn has seen his remuneration tumble 38 per cent after receiving lower bonus payments.
The figures, revealed in the Clydesdale Bank plc annual report published yesterday, show Mr Thorburn's basic salary of £450,000 was unchanged in the 12 months to September 30.
Under the bank's short-term bonus scheme he received £135,000 in shares as well as £45,000 in cash.
Through its long-term scheme, which typically assesses a variety of metrics across four years, he got £226,000 worth of deferred awards.
On top of that his benefits for the year came to £99,000 meaning his total remuneration came in at £955,000.
That was still below the £1.54 million Mr Thorburn netted in the previous year when his bonuses came to just short of £1m.
The annual report shows John Hooper, Clydesdale's chief operating officer, but also executive director for National Australia Group Europe, received £663,000 in the most recent financial year.
That was down from the £1.65m he got in the prior year.
James Pettigrew, appointed chairman in August this year, received a fee of £119,000 compared to the £80,000 he got for being a non-executive.
It is not yet known whether there will be any increases in basic salary for executives in the current financial year.
The annual report also outlines the potential impact of changes to the volume of claims for payment protection insurance redress and what financial effect the number of upheld complaints will have.
If the average redress amount were to increase by 10 per cent Clydesdale has estimated that will have a £59m impact.
There would be a £50m movement if the number of existing complaints which are being reviewed were upheld by 10 per cent more while if the number of future complaints which are upheld rises by 10 per cent then that would cost £21m.
If the number of future complaints grows by 10 per cent more than expected Clydesdale indicated that would cost around £13m.
Conversely should the number of customers the bank is contacting as part of its review of PPI fall by 10 per cent it would see a benefit of around £24m.
In the annual report it said: "There are inter-dependencies between several of the key assumptions which add to the complexity of the judgements the group has to make. This means that no single factor is likely to move independently of others."
The annual report also lays out changes to the way the bank calculates the loans which are in forbearance to align it with European Banking Authority reporting standards.
As a result of the amendments the number of mortgage loans calculated as being in forbearance was 3,202 and those had a gross carrying value of £277m. The bank notes a £6.8m impairment allowance against those mortgages. In total there are 755 now categorised as being in forbearance, equivalent to nine per cent of the portfolio, and with a gross carrying value of £730m. Clydesdale has provided a £188m impairment allowance for those.
The bank said: "The revised policies and definitions include an extension to the minimum period after which loans can exit forborne status (to two years) , resulting in a number of loans which would have previously been deemed to have exited forbearance being brought into scope for disclosure."
Under the previous measurements the total number of loans in forbearance would have fallen from 423 to 403 although the impairment allowance increased from almost £68m to £90.5m. On mortgages the loan number decreased from 802 to 752 with impairments halving to £500,000.
Clydesdale owner National Australia Bank used its annual report, published on Monday, to reaffirm its commitment to exit UK banking.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article