Pandaw River Expeditions, a Scottish-owned Far Eastern river cruise company has offered a $25,000 (£15,223) reward for information leading to the recovery of the RV Pandaw Saigon, a multi-million-pound luxury river cruise boat that went missing 70 miles from land en route from Vietnam to Singapore.
The vessel, which was under tow at the time of its disappearance and was unmanned, was bound for Burma, where Pandaw has run a successful river cruising operation since 1995,
The three-year-old vessel was originally reported by the tug operators to "have capsized in heavy seas after the hull became swamped". However, the owners now believe the boat to have been stolen, possibly to be stripped of its luxury fittings and then broken up to supply the lucrative East Asian market for scrap metal.
In an appeal to maritime and travel industry contacts, Pandaw founder Paul Strachan wrote: "I expect you will have heard rumours that the Saigon was stolen in an act of piracy rather than sunk. I cannot comment. But we have offered a reward for any information that might lead to its recovery. Please pass the reward notice to any contacts you might have, particularly in Indonesia. Meanwhile, we have investigators working on the ground."
The four-deck Saigon, which is 50 metres long and 10 metres wide, was reported lost off the Malaysian coast on December 21.
Launched by Strachan, a Burma scholar and publisher in the early 1990s, Pandaw originally traded as the Irrawaddy Flotilla Company (IFC), a revival of the Burmese riverboat service that flourished in British-ruled Burma between the 1860s and 1940s. Managed by Glasgow's P Henderson & Co, the IFC was the largest fleet of river boats in the world in the 1920s, with more than 600 vessels carrying nine million passengers a year.
Its successor, Pandaw, runs cruises on four routes on the Irrawaddy in Burma and four on the Mekong in Vietnam and Cambodia. Pandaw, which has two new ships under construction, described the loss as "a setback, but one that doesn't affect our growth plans at all".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article