THE NORTH Sea oil industry cannot expect an immediate uplift from news that oil producers cartel OPEC has agreed to cut production for the first time in eight years, even though the oil price surged in the immediate aftermath of the announcement.
At an extraordinary meeting held in Algeria on Wednesday night members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, which accounts for around 40 per cent of global supply, agreed to cut production by around 700,000 barrels a day as a means of dealing with issues of oversupply.
While the price of a barrel of Brent crude rose by six per cent to $49 on the news, Michael Tholen, upstream director at UK industry association Oil & Gas UK, said “we cannot look to oil price changes alone to solve challenges we face as an industry”.
“The oil and gas industry will continue to focus on cost and efficiency improvements as the most effective means to ensure a competitive future for this vital sector of the UK’s economy,” he added.
Bob Ruddiman, global head of energy at law firm Pinsent Masons, noted that while the OPEC announcement is good news in itself there is no guarantee that the production cuts will actually come to fruition.
“If OPEC members actually manage to coordinate it and agree among themselves the steps each has to take to cut production it could well have a [long-lasting] positive impact on the oil price, but historically they’ve not been good at coordinating these cuts,” Mr Ruddiman said.
Judith Aldersey-Williams, an Aberdeen-based partner at law firm CMS, agreed, noting that “the industry should not be lulled into a false sense of security by what may in any event be a short-lived increase”.
For Mr Ruddiman, regardless of any temporary gains in the oil price, the North Sea oil industry will not fully recover until more money is ploughed into further exploration.
“The Norwegian model of offering very generous tax incentives to drill needs to be looked at,” he said.
“We have a natural resource that we should seek to maximise the benefit from – it’s good for the UK economy to maximise oil and gas production.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel