FIVE-a-side football operator Powerleague has seen its underlying profits dip in spite of an upturn in revenue.
Accounts filed at Companies House highlighted the impact of severe weather in the first quarter of 2013 but turnover came in at £29.8 million in the 12 months to December 29, almost 10 per cent up from the £27.2m in the prior financial year.
But rising costs saw underlying operating profit fall 11 per cent from £2.55m to £2.27m. The pre-tax loss narrowed from £3.6m to £661,000 although the prior year included more than £3.1m of exceptional costs.
Two new centres were opened in London during the financial year, taking the group's total estate to 46 at the end of the period. The facilities are said to have exceeded expectations and will make strong contributions in 2014.
A strategic review carried out in 2013 saw a refurbishment programme begin and a new reward scheme for teams introduced.
Powerleague, taken off the stock exchange in a £42.5 million deal by Patron Capital in 2009, said this led to a significant increase in team numbers over the first quarter of the 2014 financial year.
The directors said new long-term sponsorship agreements - with the likes of Lucozade, Nike, Mitre and Budweiser, - along with a pipeline of new sites has put Powerleague on course to deliver its strongest performance since 2010. Around £3.5m has been spent on upgrading pitches and bars at core sites so far this year
Yesterday chief executive Sean Tracey said: "We have invested to grow the business.
"We are on a strong growth curve and our numbers will be stronger again this year."
The accounts show average monthly staff numbers increasing from 621 to 797 while employee costs rose from £7.45m to £8.1m.
Directors' remuneration rose from £612,000 to £696,000 with the highest paid seeing their emoluments increasing from £278,000 to £293,000.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article