DRINKS company Pernod Ricard has blamed a slump in Chinese sales and foreign exchange movements for a 14 per cent fall in annual profits to €1.19 billion (£946 million).
The firm, which owns Paisley-based Chivas Brothers and The Glenlivet single malt whisky, reported a 23 per cent slide in Chinese sales in the year to the end of June, following a crackdown on conspicuous consumption in the country that has hit spirits sales particularly hard.
Overall the company reported flat organic sales of €7.9bn, though this represented a seven per cent drop including the "highly unfavourable" effects of currency movements against the euro.
Chivas Regal, first made at the Strathisla Distillery in Speyside in 1786, suffered a seven per cent drop in global sales volumes to 4.6 million cases, though a price increase meant the net sales decline was pared to 4 per cent.
Sales of Ballantine's blended Scotch fell five per cent to 5.9m cases. The Glenlivet's net sales improved eight per cent to 1m cases, helped by a 2 per cent rise in volumes and a price rise.
The group, which has more than a dozen distilleries in Scotland, plans to cut 900 jobs worldwide to save costs. Pernod has also reduced its advertising budget by nine per cent in the past year.
"Despite an environment that was more difficult than anticipated, we have delivered the guidance announced in February, proof of everyone's commitment, which I would like to commend," said Pierre Pringuet, chief executive of the Paris-based group.
Absolut vodka, Pernod's best-selling brand, saw net sales fall one per cent to 11.1m cases in the year.
Sales volumes of Jacob's Creek, its most popular wine, fell six per cent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article