HUNDREDS of thousands of tonnes of toxic waste buried in east Glasgow are to be cleaned up in a regeneration project for a fraction of the original estimated cost.
The Shawfield area south of the Clyde was the site of J&J White's Chemical Works (later ACC Chrome and Chemicals) from the 1820s until the late 1960s. It was used as a dumping ground for hexavalent chromium, a carcinogenic substance long blamed by campaigners for the high rates of leukaemia among residents nearby.
Now urban regeneration company Clyde Gateway wants to make the site suitable for two million square feet of offices and industrial units – about half the total space it aims to develop in the east side of the city.
It is seeking a contractor to clean up the area using a chemical injection process that avoids the need to dig up the chromium.
It was originally thought the work would cost hundreds of millions of pounds, but Clyde Gateway now believes it will cost between £2.4 million and £4.8m. It is part of a £19m programme to make the site ready for development and build a bridge over the Clyde to link to the new Dalmarnock railway station.
Clyde Gateway spokesman Jim Clarke said of the chemical injection process: "It doesn't mean you can now put houses on [the land], but it's suitable for commercial and industrial requirements."
He said Clyde Gateway would probably put up the first building on the site, most likely for offices.
But some property specialists questioned whether this was the right strategy, pointing out that the west of Scotland already has a lot of office space that could not be let.
Clarke said Clyde Gateway was keeping an open mind on potential use: "If the market tells us the site would be ideal for industrial, that is what we will do."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article