You do not get to write as badly as Jack Kerouac did without a great deal of practice, and recent Kerouac studies have been stoked with rediscovered juvenilia and "lost" texts.
Up to 2002 the sprawling, Thomas Wolfe-like The Town And The City was the only literary staging post on the road that turned Jean-Louis Kerouac into Saint Jack Of The Beats. Then a 1944-45 novella called Orpheus Emerged appeared, followed by a first collaboration with William Burroughs under the alarming title And The Hippos Were Boiled In Their Tanks. Two years ago it was the turn of The Sea Is My Brother, appearing first in Slovak, bizarrely. Written off the back of Jack's very brief service in the US Merchant Marine, it was rightly characterised by him as a "crock".
So where does The Haunted Life fit into this seemingly endless regress? It was written in 1944, at a difficult and emotional time for Kerouac, shortly after his friend Sebastian Sampas, a non-combatant, was killed in action at Anzio and during the furore that surrounded Lucien Carr's fatal stabbing of David Kammerer in New York. The manuscript is just one of many that Kerouac worked on during this period and as he struggled to find an idiom.
His surrogate in the story, Peter Martin, lives in the small New England town of Galloway (a re-imagined version of Lowell, Massachusetts) inhabiting a den-like room in the family home stacked with notes, manuscripts, honoured and second-rank books ranging from the Bible (never to be underestimated as a source for Kerouac) and Thoreau to William Saroyan and the "Hemingway-Fitzgerald-Dos Passos group".
Where the setting seems to depart from autobiographical fact is in the person of Peter's father, a ranting populist and avid follower of Father Charles Coughlin's anti-New Deal broadcasts, whose rightward swing anticipated the way America was heading after the war. In contrast to Martin senior, Jack describes Leo Kerouac in an associated sketch included here as the most honest of men, a loving father and Christian spirit.
That Peter's emergence from the chrysalis needs some kind of climatic and environmental tension is obvious, but father and son's wrestling with the radio dial is too obviously schematic; Peter wants to listen to Benny Goodman (a Jew who had fronted the first inter-racial jazz group to achieve stardom), while his father revels in conspiracy stories about Semites and Africans.
The element of music is, however, centrally important to what's going on in The Haunted Life. The autobiographical element, inspired by Jack's understanding that he has to emulate his friends Sampas and Billy Chandler and cut even loving ties, is less important than a young writer's attempt to find the music in his prose.
Along with all those books and papers Peter gathers is an interesting array of records, ranging from Goodman, Artie Shaw, late Swing and early bop to Delius, Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninoff and, strikingly, Shostakovich, whose wartime music was to reach an international audience and to suggest how autobiography, anger and resistance could (and necessarily had to be) expressed covertly and wordlessly.
Editor Todd Tietchen spins out the notion that, as for Shostakovich, who regarded every piece he wrote as a memorial for someone lost in war or Terror, Kerouac formed the notion of writing as a kind of romantic necrology, a way of keeping dead spirits alive in an almost physical realm. Read in this light, A Haunted Life makes a more vivid sense. Heard symphonically rather than as "spontaneous bop prosody", it works at an aural level, its steady, slightly solemn periods a workmanlike piece of modern, but not modernist, composition.
The most important lesson of the novella, as of its posthumous predecessors, is that there really is no such thing as the dramatic, fully formed literary debut. There is always forematter and waste. Perhaps these youthful excursions really are not meant to be shared, but there are important lessons in them, not least that genius is nothing more than hard labour.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article