Dutch author Koch had a huge hit on his hands with his last novel, The Dinner, a story of how the veneer of innocence is stripped away from a middle class family in the course of an evening.
Its follow-up, Summer House With Swimming Pool, doesn't stray too far from that successful formula, in that it wallows in the darkness lurking under the surface of respectability: the thoughts we can't acknowledge and the things we would allow ourselves to do if we thought we could get away with them.
Marc Schlosser is a GP whose patients seem largely to comprise arty types whom Schlosser feels look down on him for being a mere physician. He's become jaded, fed-up with his clientele.
However, he's a little more receptive to celebrated stage actor Ralph Meier, who's about to become even more famous in an HBO series about Augustus Caesar, and accepts an invitation to drop by the Meiers' summer house when he's on holiday with his wife and two daughters.
As the story begins, Meier is already dead and, as a result, Marc faces accusations of malpractice. Later, in flashback, we see the Schlosser family's holiday, their hook-up with the Meiers and the nightmarish circumstances that led, somehow, to Meier's death.
As befits the author of grimly sardonic social satires, Koch seems to delight in an unapologetic, red-blooded form of misanthropy, introducing us to several lecherous, untrustworthy men, chief among them being the sybaritic Meier himself, a fellow of gargantuan appetites who appraises women like fine dishes on a table.
He has an eye for Marc's wife. But Marc also has an eye for his. And Marc's own primal nature isn't hard to awaken either.
It could be argued that Koch is too relentlessly cynical about human beings, but his comedic sense is clearly engaged at all times, and, furthermore, like a thriller writer, he understands that darkness and grit can drive a plot and ramp up tension like nothing else. Even more than The Dinner, Summer House With Swimming Pool has the capacity to induce discomfort, but it shares that book's ridiculous readability, daring one, in vain, to try putting it down between chapters.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article