How Did We Get Into This Mess? Politics, Equality, Nature
George Monbiot
Verso, £16.99
Reviewed by Brian Morton
This is a collection of George Monbiot's best and most urgent newspaper columns. The title and subtitle seem self-explanatory, though “equality” might seem more a question of perspective and judgement than the other pair. In a sense, Monbiot has an easy job, though he sometimes makes it sound like a mission of lonely knight errantry. His role is to tilt against every symptom of the heedless neoliberalism (the ideology without ideology) that governs our postmodern world.
His message is best conveyed in an article of December 2014 called Everything Is Connected in The Guardian. Typically, it’s an eclectic mix of biology, ethics and geopolitics, bringing together whale poo, “trophic cascades”, and the evolutionary role of very large predators, of which we have become the kingpin. There is a touch of glibness to his demonstration of some aspects of that connectedness, as when he describes the connection between the whaling industry and the fate of the American condor. It all gets a little close to the infamous “butterfly/hurricane” equation, but it’s a point and it’s well made.
The headline conclusion is that everything has context and consequence and so we might be advised – and this really is radical – to think before we act, in almost any situation. That such an injunction does now seem radical is a token of the kind of steamrollering corporatism that affects everything from economics and international relations to education and the arts. Monbiot’s eclecticism and autodidactic grasp of umpteen disciplines is both his great strength and occasional weakness. When he turns his attention to something as close at hand – our hand – as the parlous state of the Rest and Be Thankful road in Argyll, which is annually threatened with mudslide and avalanche, Presto! he has the answer in a line: remove the sheep, which are economically unviable anyway, and let the scrub and small trees regenerate. But there’s a bigger question, which the everything-is-connected philosophy should have prompted: why is that road there in the first place, and why is there such dependence on that narrow, readily blocked artery?
Monbiot is at his best when he engages with nature. His philosophy of rewilding is almost unanswerable. “Almost” because by definition every curative intervention will have unintended consequences somewhere down the line. Our best course would be to subsist and desist, but we are closer to the angels than that. Monbiot’s turn of phrase is impeccable. When he challenges us with the headline Civilisation Is Boring (if this is a sub-editor’s creation, it is still brilliant) he tops the rhetoric with a lovely line that declares civilisation to be “but a flimsy dust sheet that we have thrown over a psyche rich in emotion and instinct, shaped by the living planet”. Dustsheets tend to be associated with empty houses and unvisited museums, but those are exactly what our collective psyche has built and then abandoned, so the image still works.
Admirers tend to liken him to another George, but the Orwellian strain in these essays is perhaps less obvious than the Swiftian. There is the same gnashing anger at the mess we’re making; the same mobile intelligence and ability to naturalise and apply a difficult concept; and there is the same devastating ability to express an outrageous idea in almost sarcastically bland terms. Looking at a loveless, thoughtless, affectless world, in which the main temptations for young men and women are either pseudo-violence or non-communication of one sort or another, Monbiot offers his own modest proposal: that we should jail or intern the young until the awkward business of growing up is past. It’s a great joke. I assume he’s joking.
The more obvious indices of a Swiftian vision are there as well. Monbiot sees Brobdinagian problems confronted by Liliputian “statesman” and Laputan science, and a civil society run by yahoos or tutted over by Houyhnhnms. This leaves him just one role, as solitary world-traveller, armed with curiosity, intelligence and cutlass prose, who concludes that the bulk of us are (as his great predecessor had it) “the most pernicious race of little odious vermin that nature ever suffered to crawl upon the earth” but concedes us some tolerance, much love and even a little eleventh-hour hope.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here