Whether for reasons of modesty or post-modernism, Kilmarnock-born Burnet claims only to be the translator for this novel, which purports to have been written by a disillusioned French author named Raymond Brunet.
A longtime fan of Georges Simenon, Burnet seems to have preferred to invent his own French novelist to tell the story than take the credit himself.
And this novel does indeed have the feel of a classic tale that's been knocking around for decades. Inspired by a visit to a brasserie in the very real town of Saint-Louis, where he discerned that the regular customers were locked into static daily routines, he came up with the character Manfred Baumann, a bank manager who has never fitted in, not with the boys at school, not even with the other habitués of the Restaurant de la Cloche. "Among those who lunched daily at the Cloche," Burnet writes, "there was, like railyway commuters, a tacit understanding of the boundaries of communication."
Manfred exemplifies this lifestyle of habit and routine. He thinks that simply changing his regular lunch order is an act of rebellion so momentous that it will cause a commotion among the staff, and is dismayed when it doesn't. Routine is protection for Manfred, and breaching it only invites suspicion.
While walking home one night, he sees the waitress, Adèle, being picked up by a boy on a motorbike. When he finds out that Adèle has gone missing, he can't bring himself to admit that he was spying on her and, having told the police that he saw nothing, won't go back on his original statement. But by sticking to his story he arouses the suspicions of Inspector Gorski, another well-drawn character, whose snooty wife is embarrassed to be married to a mere policeman, and the two men are forced into a situation where one has to outwit the other.
Burnet skilfully knits together a solid detective story and a compelling character study to make a captivating psychological thriller in which a man whose life is marked by underachievement is pitched against one who conceals his paranoia and sense of guilt behind an unvarying routine. Very accessible and thoroughly satisfying.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article