Model Janice Dickinson is suing Bill Cosby for defamation over denials by the veteran comedian's representatives after she accused him of raping her in 1982.
Dickinson's lawsuit seeks unspecified damages on defamation, false light and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims.
It states she has been re-victimised and her reputation has suffered because of pointed denials by Cosby's lawyer that the comedian drugged and raped her in a Lake Tahoe, California, hotel room more than 30 years ago.
The allegations were first made in an interview with Entertainment Tonight last year after numerous other women accused Cosby of drugging them and inappropriate sexual conduct dating back several decades.
The lawsuit says Dickinson, 60, sought a retraction of the denials from Cosby, 77, but the request was denied.
Cosby's lawyer Martin Singer called Dickinson's rape allegations "false and outlandish" in a letter to The Associated Press last year.
The lawsuit details Dickinson's claims that Cosby raped her after giving her wine and a pill in the hotel room, and how she wanted to go public with her story in a 2002 autobiography, but was prevented from doing so by the book's publisher.
She did not report the incident to police in the early 1980s out of fear of retaliation by Cosby, her lawsuit states.
The statute of limitations to criminally prosecute the actor-comedian has long since passed, as has the statute on civil claims directly related to the incident.
"This is Janice Dickinson's chance for justice," her lawyer Lisa Bloom said.
Three women who have accused Cosby of abuse have sued him for defamation in a Massachusetts federal court.
One of them, Therese Serignese, said after a court hearing earlier this month that she wanted her reputation restored after Cosby's camp branded her a liar. Dickinson's lawsuit is seeking a similar outcome.
"Cosby knows that he drugged and raped Ms Dickinson," the lawsuit states. "He knew that calling her rape disclosure a lie was a false statement."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article