After a tame opening last week, A Play, A Pie, and A Pint gets into its stride here with Catrin Evans' challenging, and unsettling, look at a couple's past relationship – and their different recollections of it.
Ella (Louise Ludgate) has contacted old flame Mike (Colin McCreadie), via Facebook, asking to meet to discuss something really important. The request is all the more puzzling to Mike as the couple haven't seen each other for 20 years.
Initially the piece mines a comic, Brief Encounter-esque tension, as they meet at a train station and nervously play catch-up. Both are no longer the randy teenagers they once were, and have kids of their own, but still score some character assassination points off each other.
The thoughts that have been plaguing Mike – is Ella here to reveal a long-lost love child, or offer up some dying Aids confession? – are also swiftly dismissed. But just when you think the play looks likely to continue as a likeable comedy of manners, Evans brings the subject of sexual consent during their relationship together into play, and the piece assumes an altogether much darker hue and force.
Anyone who has followed the story of Wiki-leaks founder Julian Assange will recognise the sexual, moral, and political debate that then explodes on stage.
McCreadie and Ludgate turn in fine, nuanced performances as the former lovers. However, the character played by Vari Sylvester, an old biddy who stops to chat to them, isn't just underwritten but totally unnecessary. That defect aside, this is thought-provoking stuff about remembrances of things past, and what constitutes acceptable behaviour.
Sponsored by Heineken
HHHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article